The future for non whites if we don’t drag them along with us.....


As we of the superior white race continue to progress into the future and eventually leave this world, to venture into space and further progress on to bigger and better things of progression, the niggers and other meek races, who are laterally earthbound in comparison to us ,will indeed inherit this world that we have left behind.

Without the white man around the niggers will die off from natural selection, while the mongoloids and mixed breed races live on.

The gooks not having the white mans creations and breakthroughs to modify and copy will maintain at the level they were at when we left. Also they will rule over the other races like spics and sand niggers.


Eventually after we are gone, the predicted end of the earth will come. More then likely from the sun turning into a red giant and expanding and will encompass and engulf the earth and mars. Thus wiping out all of the non whites left on earth.


                                               

I Hardly See Any New And Interesting Posts Here Nowadays.

There are a lot of notable jewish scientists. Latest example - Grigory Perelman.

What gives?

So I'd like to try anal intercourse but I am not a homosexual or anything etc..

I've been doing some research on the internets and wondering if I should take some courses at uni or something, will acting like a homosexual make me a homosexual?

Is that stuff natural dead skin cells, or just from dried semen? Why does it build up into peelable layers?

Has it ever occured to you that if God was both all-powerful and all-loving he wouldn't create a world with suffering in it? There is unnecessary suffering, no one can doubt that. Some point out that we cause suffering to ourselves through our choices, because God gave us free will. Well, not all suffering is caused by other humans. What about natural disaters? Did hurricane Katrina happen because someone out there chose to make other humans suffer? I don't think so.
 
There is no point to having suffering on earth to teach us lessons. If God is all-powerful, he can create a world where we learn through non-painful ways. God can, if he is all-powerful, create a world where we don't suffer while still giving us free will. God has the power to shape this wordl any way he wants, but he doesn't seem to choose to do it in an all-loving way. For those that think a perfect hedonistic paradise would be boring, you don't seem to understand what God can do. God could make it so that we were always happy, and never got bored of it. You might think that God changing our desires is interferring with our free will. However, how is giving us a slightly different set of desires then the one we have any different, really? God gave us the temptation to do bad things, and then said we shouldn't do them. Hmmm, did he really expect us to be good ALL the time? It's like a parent putting a gun in the child's room, and telling them they can't touch or use it cause it's bad, even when the parent knows they gave the child the desire to use the gun.

Why is hell eternal if God loves us? Lets call God our parent for now, its a fair analogy. Parents punish their children for things they did wrong, including the choices we make. However, punishment always has a reason: it's to teach us a lesson. If hell is eternal, then there is no point to it, because we never get out. If I am sent to hell for not believing in God, I wouldn't learn the error of my ways. I would learn to hate God because he stuck me down in hell for eternity.

God sucks.

My political opinion is based on the facts which are used to develop utilitarian policies. I am also a meritocrat, so I do not discriminate based on race. I have been informed by a liberal that I should not look at anthropological facts involving the differences between different genetic groups of humans as I am subconsciously racist and will go out and commit hate crimes if I were to look at the facts. This illogical opinion was done with sincerity so I am sure that the liberal was not a troll. I believe it is the individual's responsibility to do his bit for ideas which are collective in nature so as a result I am going to take interest in anthropology and compile facts that liberals do not wish me to see as a form of resistance against extremism. This is my motivation, if liberals were not such ass wads I would be doing something else.

Observably negro skulls are much more different than caucasian and mongoloid skulls.

Sub-saharra Africa is barren of any archaeology until 1000 AD, whereas caucasians and mongoloids began to leave substantial evidence of civilisation during the bronze ages, even in central america which was completely cut off from the rest of the world which can be contrasted with africa which was influenced by arabs since early history.

The civilisations on the coast of the indian ocean and the Nile were all heavily influenced by the arabs and despite their substantial influence, civilisation never spread further than the arab trading posts and the Nile until around 1000 AD.

The out of Africa theory is correct and it means that the evolution of sub-saharran humans has remained closer to equilibrium than those humans who left africa who had a stronger impetus to evolve to the new environment. This is congruent with the scientific fact that the caucasian and mongoloid race are much more closely related to each other than either are related to negroes and their similiar skull shapes and cranial cavities.

While there are no sub-species (races) within humanity, there are wide genetic differences which are congruent between groups that are socially considerred to be races. And it has been genetically proven that mongoloids and caucasians have diverged from negroes by around 5000 generations, whilst asians and whites have diverged by 2000 generations from each other and of course had the impetus to evolve due to the new environments they were facing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_multilocus_allele_clusters

Hi,

I am looking for information on creating a loyal lolita sex slave for educational purposes.

Does anyone have a recipe, tutorial, or something like that?

Much appreciated,

Anonymous.

They cannot comprehend the idea that some things they may never find an answer to.

For example.

How old is the earth? I don't know. All I can say is "there is evidence to suggest how old it is".

Religions aim to find people who are stupid enough to believe in things without evidence, so they claim to have the answers to such questions and when someone shows interest it means they are impressionable and can be used.

Hi /sci, I have a question for you: My girlfriend and I enjoy anal sex, me giving. Before we engage into it, we have this kind of habit; she bends over and I start licking her pussy, then move onto her anus, and lick her there for a while, until it starts becoming looser and I can enter it with the tip of my tongue. Then we add lubrication and start with finger play (both hers and mine), and then finally I penetrate her.

I'm wondering how healthy could licking her ass be. She's clean (she cleans herself with water and sometimes takes an enema before we play), but sometimes when entering her anus I taste a bit acid; I guess something remains but it's not that I care; I love her with all my soul and I like everything hers, it's just that I'm worried that it might be unhealthy to lick her there so much. Problem is, I really love licking her, and she loves it too; one time she told me the whole reason why she wants to do it so often is that I lick her anus; she masturbates while I do and she's in heaven.

What do you think? Should I use my fingers instead of my tongue? Should we do it in the shower?