Update 2024-03-27: Greatly expanded the "Samples" page and renamed it to "Glossary".
Update 2024-04-04: Added 5 million mid-2011 posts from the k47 post dump. Browse (mostly) them here.
Update 2024-04-07: Added ~400 October 2003 posts from 4chan.net. Browse them here.

Welcome to Oldfriend Archive, the official 4chan archive of the NSA. Hosting ~170M text-only 2003-2014 4chan posts (mostly 2006-2008).

Threads by latest replies - Page 5

[1362351134] What's the evolutionary advantage of

No.55707 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
pedophilia?
10 posts omitted

[1376824283] Lateral Thinking

No.56333 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Think laterally

A sideways look at why we should use lateral thinking.

Three switches outside a windowless room are connected to three light bulbs inside the room. Can you determine which switch is connected to which bulb if you are only allowed to enter the room once? (You'll have to wait for the answer.)

   Solving this problem is an example of the art of 'lateral thinking', a term coined in 1967 by Edward de Bono, a leading authority in the field of creative and conceptual thinking. Lateral thinking is for changing concepts and perceptions. To be successful lateral thinkers, we need to become alert to the assumptions we make when we assess a situation. The difficulty with assumptions is that a lot of the time they serve a very useful purpose by providing us with a mental shorthand for dealing with the world. The box, outside of which we are often encouraged to think, is actually a box of assumptions. We should ask: What are we assuming to be true today, that is or might turn out to be a wrong assumption?

   OK, here's the answer to the light bulb puzzle: switch on the first switch, leave it for a minute, and then switch it off again. Then switch on the second switch and enter the room. The second switch will be connected to the light that is on, the first switch will be connected to the light with the warm bulb, and the third switch will be connected to the light with the cold bulb.

Pete : "AH, THEY'VE REFURBISHED THE STAFF ROOM! LET'S GET SOME MORE LIGHTS ON."

CLICK The kettle is on.

CLICK The television is on: "AND NOW THE MORNING NEWS..."

CLICK Blackout

[1154683587] Bigger brain =/= more intelligent

No.8202 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200608/s1704016.htm

Researchers bust head size-intelligence link

By Judy Skatssoon for ABC Science Online

The genes that are thought to have helped humans evolve big brains do not appear to play any role in how intelligent we are, according to a DNA study.

This backs separate research that has failed to come up with a link between head size and intelligence, except in extreme congenital abnormalities.

The Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QMIR) study is the first to specifically look at genes, head size and intelligence in a normal population.

The Australian study finds that people who scored highly in intelligence tests did not necessarily possess versions of the genes that are expected to code for big heads and intelligence.

People who did possess the suspected 'smart' versions of the genes were not necessarily the most intelligent or the ones with the biggest brains.

The study will be presented at the 11th International Congress of Human Genetics in Brisbane next week.
Head space

The researchers tested 4,395 teenagers for head size and intelligence.

They also looked at the genes ASPM, MCPH1 and CDK5RAP2, which regulate brain size and activity.

When mutated, these genes result in an abnormally small brain, a condition known as congenital microcephaly.

"Normal variation in these genes has not yet been investigated in relation to head size and intelligence," Dr Michelle Luciano, a research fellow at QMIR, said.

She says the only comparable previous study used MRI imaging to measure brain volume in relation to two microcephaly genes.

"Their findings [about a relation to brain size] were negative and they didn't find a relationship with two of the genes we were looking at," Dr Luciano said.

"We decided to take it a step further and look at intelligence and lo and behold we find a similar negative result."
Ancestral or evolved?

We all carry the three genes the QMIR team investigated but some of us carry 'ancestral', or less evolved, versions and others carry 'derived' or more recently evolved versions.

Some of us carry one of each.

Dr Luciano says researchers had expected that people with evolved versions of the gene would be smarter and have bigger heads, but were surprised to find this was not the case.

"We would predict that if you've got the more recent version you should have a higher IQ," she said.

"We actually found that not to be the case.

"It is unlikely then that selective pressure for these genes is related to the evolution of intelligence in humans."

Rather, she says the genes might be important for a neurological function outside the brain.
Are humans getting smarter?

Professor Colin Groves, an expert in human evolution from the Australian National University, says human brains began getting bigger after our earliest ancestors like Homo habilis appeared.

But our brains have stopped growing and have actually started getting smaller, or at least more 'compact'.

"[Our brains] have got bigger but they're not getting bigger," he said.

"In fact since the late Pleistocene in general they've got smaller."

Professor Groves says while brain size appears to be related to intelligence between species, this does not seem to be the case within a species.

Despite the development of technological advances, he says there is no evidence that Homo sapiens have become more intelligent in the last 50,000 years.
13 posts omitted

[1223859552] Total moves possible in Chess?

No.38196 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Has anyone ever figured out how many games/moves are possible in chess?  There should be some easy formula right?  With a cutoff for obvious draw situations like a white king & bishop/knight chasing around a single black king.
1 post omitted

[1370883390] math is for nerds

No.55990 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
calculate this, nerds

*grabs dick*
1 post omitted

[1390452210] Sex Positions

No.56647 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Lloyd Lester "Sizzling Sex Positions" Report : http://www.gspotmastery.com/sizzlingposition5026.pdf

[1388558672] Flying

No.56621 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
FLYING A GYRO

The Australian Sports Rotorcraft Association's website describes a gyroplane as an aircraft that flies using freely-turned rotor blades.

   Modern gyroplanes have two propellers, one overhead and one behind the cabin, and are light and easily manoeuvrable.

   They are slower than aeroplanes but faster than helicopters.

   However, unlike helicopters, they cannot hover.

• A typical single-seat gyroplane is about 4.25m long and 2.4m high. When empty, it weighs about 230kg.

• Most gyroplanes fly under 920m above ground because most pilots like the scenery at the lower altitudes. Specially modified gyroplanes have gone 6km high.

• The gyroplane is a stable flying platform. This is not so with helicopters, which pull the air down through engine-powered rotor blades making it possible to hover, but also making the aircraft very complicated and expensive to fly.

• Most gyroplanes fly between 70kmh and 100kmh.

• Gyroplanes depend on air currents for flight and can only fly if there is wind.

[1389581181] Hilarious Examination Answers

No.56633 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
A biology teacher gives a witty comeback to a student who decided to write rubbish on a class test : https://screen.yahoo.com/teachers-hilarious-response-awful-exam-224511848.html

[1389894403] Fossil

No.56638 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
Fossil sheds new light on sea-to-land transition

An illustration of Tiktaalik roseae, which looked like a cross between a crocodile and a fish. The species appeared to have used rear fins in the way limbs are used.

WASHINGTON - A 375-million-year-old fossil has shed new light on the theory of evolution, challenging the widespread view that large hind appendages first appeared after vertebrates transitioned from the water to land.

   A report in the Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences on Monday said the well-preserved pelvis and partial pelvic fin of a Tiktaalik roseae - which looked like a cross between a crocodile and a fish - indicated hind legs actually began as hind fins.

   First discovered in 2004, Tiktaalik roseae are the best-known transitional species which bridged the leap between fish and land-dwelling tetrapods.

   Studies of the species had previously indicated that the creature grew up to 2.7m in length and hunted in shallow freshwater environments. It was equipped with gills, scales and fins but also had tetrapod-like characteristics such as a mobile neck, ribcage and lungs. The species also had large forefins, with shoulders, elbows and partial wrists.

   However, analysis of fossils recovered from a dig site in northern Canada in 2004 revealed a fuller picture of the hind quarters of the creature for the first time.

   Scientists found a pelvic girdle, a prominent ball and socket hip joint and a highly mobile femur which extended beneath the body.

   Said one of the report's co-authors, Dr Edward Daeschler: "Tiktaalik was a combination of primitive and advanced features...They appear to have used the fin in a way that's more suggestive of the way a limb gets used."

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE