>>1740759I think your bratty little tirade is proof enough your book will probably be a hundred-and-twenty pages of "You against Them". How did we reach these wild leaps in judgement, you ask?
You are referencing Huxley's vision of the future as "reality".
He was right about, what? Medication (but only to a small degree), advertisement (but only to a small degree), and about the tiniest bits about surveillance culture (in that yes, there are video cameras now).
You are claiming "self image", "obsession with fashion" and "aestheticism" would make for "condemning" topical literature. As opposed to, you know, the driving forces of Greek Philosophy, the Renaissance, any god-damn social liberties movement.