Quoted By:
US seeks stricter oversight of World Bank
Bill passed ordering US member of bank's board to vote against any major hydroelectric project
Washington - The US is demanding stricter oversight of World Bank projects amid concern that the bank has slipped in how closely it guards against violence, forced resettlement and other conflicts associated with the works that it funds.
In a blow to plans set by World Bank president Jim Yong Kim, Washington recently approved an appropriations Bill that orders the bank's US board member to vote against any major hydroelectric project - a type of development that has been a source of local land conflicts and controversies throughout the bank's history. The measure also demands that the organisation undertake "independent outside evaluations" of all of its lending.
The demand coincides with a spate of disputes between the World Bank, civil society groups and the United States over past bank-funded projects that have been linked to killings of villagers and forcing people from their land.
The bank has extensive procedures to guard the rights of local residents and a number of ostensibly independent review bodies inside its bureaucracy. But the growing concerns led Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Sub-committee on Foreign Operations, to make a broad call for stricter oversight by an outside organisation.
Mr David Carle, Mr Leahy's spokesman, said the senator believes the bank's renewed interest in large hydro projects "is a mistake and wanted to send that message".
A World Bank spokesman said the US demand was still being analysed and that "we will work with the US to understand their views". The US vote alone would not be enough to block hydroelectric or other projects from moving forward.
But the Leahy amendments to the recently approved US$1.55 billion for the World Bank's concessional lending arm recommend withholding US funding for the bank unless an outside evaluation process is established.
They also require US Treasury officials and the US member of the World Bank board to pressure the organisation to more quickly resolve disputes in which "individuals and communities... suffer violations of human rights, including forced displacement, resulting from any loan, grant, strategy or policy".
The amendments apply to all international financial institutions, including regional ones such as the Inter-American Development Bank and the African Development Bank. But the focus was on the World Bank, and the measure referred specifically to disputes in Cambodia, Ethiopia and Guatemala.
Washington Post
Bill passed ordering US member of bank's board to vote against any major hydroelectric project
Washington - The US is demanding stricter oversight of World Bank projects amid concern that the bank has slipped in how closely it guards against violence, forced resettlement and other conflicts associated with the works that it funds.
In a blow to plans set by World Bank president Jim Yong Kim, Washington recently approved an appropriations Bill that orders the bank's US board member to vote against any major hydroelectric project - a type of development that has been a source of local land conflicts and controversies throughout the bank's history. The measure also demands that the organisation undertake "independent outside evaluations" of all of its lending.
The demand coincides with a spate of disputes between the World Bank, civil society groups and the United States over past bank-funded projects that have been linked to killings of villagers and forcing people from their land.
The bank has extensive procedures to guard the rights of local residents and a number of ostensibly independent review bodies inside its bureaucracy. But the growing concerns led Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Sub-committee on Foreign Operations, to make a broad call for stricter oversight by an outside organisation.
Mr David Carle, Mr Leahy's spokesman, said the senator believes the bank's renewed interest in large hydro projects "is a mistake and wanted to send that message".
A World Bank spokesman said the US demand was still being analysed and that "we will work with the US to understand their views". The US vote alone would not be enough to block hydroelectric or other projects from moving forward.
But the Leahy amendments to the recently approved US$1.55 billion for the World Bank's concessional lending arm recommend withholding US funding for the bank unless an outside evaluation process is established.
They also require US Treasury officials and the US member of the World Bank board to pressure the organisation to more quickly resolve disputes in which "individuals and communities... suffer violations of human rights, including forced displacement, resulting from any loan, grant, strategy or policy".
The amendments apply to all international financial institutions, including regional ones such as the Inter-American Development Bank and the African Development Bank. But the focus was on the World Bank, and the measure referred specifically to disputes in Cambodia, Ethiopia and Guatemala.
Washington Post