Update 2024-03-27: Greatly expanded the "Samples" page and renamed it to "Glossary".
Update 2024-04-04: Added 5 million mid-2011 posts from the k47 post dump . Browse (mostly) them here .
Update 2024-04-07: Added ~400 October 2003 posts from 4chan.net . Browse them here .
Welcome to Oldfriend Archive, hosting ~170M text-only 2003-2014 4chan posts (mostly 2006-2008). Threads by latest replies - Page 5
Anonymous
Quoted By:
What do you guys think of this?
ComradeGiant !!9vMWYeqV4O4
Quoted By:
I am glad that Gerald Wiegert has made enough money over the years to continue his cocaine fueled quest to build a supercar.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
It is a fucking beast, but lolhennessey so no. Would love to have the time and money to build my own monster exige though, and if somebody who had a history of worksmanship and integrity were building them it would be just about the most orgasmic thing in the world.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Haven't really looked into it, I don't have that kind of money and would rather waste what I do have on building shitty stuff into shittier stuff that goes faster.
Hairy Britfag
WINDOWS XP32bit
Quoted By:
>>4637761 That GTO is the definition of rice.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm American, don't believe in rice, and I buy American, buy my question is: Why don't more cars use rotary engines instead of pistons and cylinders?
Anonymous
>>4637702 If you think Fords are the only vehicles out there that are "cost reduced", you're smoking stronger shit than I care to even be around. Especially if you're comparing them to another mass production company like Mazda. Especially fucking Mazda, considering the close relationship and parts-sharing that occurs between Ford and Mazda (i.e. cars that are FUCKING IDENTICAL other than sheet-metal, like the MX-6/Probe, Escort/Protege, Ranger/BXXXX, Fusion/6, Focus/3, etc, etc, etc)
Ford apprentice !5zb/EKX0ks
Quoted By:
>>4637690 Yea, no kidding. I especially hate how no one understands the relationship between the engine and the transmission and how it multiplies torque.
HowITripCode? !!DU22SQMj6dQ
Quoted By:
>Why don't more cars use rotary engines
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Rotaries are terribly inefficient in a thermodynamic sense. Nothing you can do aside from developing ceramic blocks and rotors will solve this.
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
Quoted By:
>>4637773 >you're smoking stronger shit than I care to even be around. lulz
Anonymous
This is my family's vehicular armada. Please rate. To better shape your insults, I live in Western PA.
ep3_lol !!FP9Bp7VWRiZ
Quoted By:
'05 Civic Si
I now realize how many Range Rovers we have...
Just Expecting Every Problem !2JdOvIfmOM!!jpkjhRHE66J
Just Expecting Every Problem !2JdOvIfmOM!!jpkjhRHE66J Tue 03 May 2011 04:33:00 No. 4637774 Report Quoted By:
thataudiguy !!Ix3EG/L3R/8
Quoted By:
-2007 F150 XLT
Gosai_Ijin
Quoted By:
>>4637461 I lol'ed pretty hard OP. I live in Western PA as well.
You're family has some pretty shabby rides (the Taurus and the Cirrus or w.e) but i like the Charger and im hoping one of those vans is a 4wd to help with the snow and hills.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
There's this Lexus IS 200 at the dealer near me. I am planning to buy it as my first car. Only thing that conserns me is that it has been driven for 296 000km (185 000miles) which is kinda lot I think.
Hairy Britfag
Quoted By:
get something shittier with less miles. something you wont mind getting some scratches and dings on.
Overboard and Self-Assured !!yvm0QrHZZJQ
Overboard and Self-Assured !!yvm0QrHZZJQ Tue 03 May 2011 04:45:00 No. 4637809 Report Quoted By:
>dem wheels
nyan !91iMi6CIYI
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Wats ur opinion about the Nsx vs Corvette? same body, size, and capability but way different price and performance...>NSX- Better looking, technologies, advance, track specialist and will last longer. >Corvette- Faster and cheaper.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4637784 He'll be discussing off-camber rolling resistance, trunk lid aerodynamics and key fob tractability AND MORE very shortly.
WINDOWS XP32bit
>>4637786 I never said NSX parts would be cheap, but you're not going to be finding Corvette parts like it's a normal car.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4637796 alright, but they're going to be relatively easy to find compared to a goddamn NSX.
Satellite440(Xephinroth) !!NuqLANSpf21
Satellite440(Xephinroth) !!NuqLANSpf21 Tue 03 May 2011 04:40:00 No. 4637798 Report Quoted By:
>Nsx better looking >Will last longer >advance >corvette is faster >Cheaper
Facel-Vega !!NPyXKZNV85f
Quoted By:
Difficult question.>C5 vs. NSX >C4 vs. NSX >C4 ZR-1 vs. NSX
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Just got hired repairing chipped windshields. Anyone do this before? Only pays commission but itll be worth it if I repair one an hour.
Anonymous
sup o,
Anonymous
need more info about engines .... which one is in B6 and which one in B7 'cause B7s have some shitty engines ....
Anonymous
>>4637047 finally some fucking help, champ
both B6 and B7 are 4cylinder multi injection 2.0L if that helps
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Watch out for the multi-tronic. It's made out of
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4637203 \Well honestly, the exact codes of engines (3 letter codes like BLB, AWX etc) would really help 'couse that's the way I can tell you 'bout them something more ... now I can tell you only that multitronics on Audi are getting better and better, my father has 2004 A6 with 120000kms, he changed oil once and has no problems at all :)
Those engine codes would really help ....
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4636811 I'm in the same boat as you (looking at a $15-$22k car, preferably something fun & european).
Looked at both B6 & B7, read reviews, found out they have crystal transmissions (i.e. fragile as glass and expensive to replace), decided to go with a different brand.
I've moved on, and am now looking at BMWs (or possibly the SAAB Turbo X, if I can ever find a manual one in the upper midwest :-/).
Anonymous
Is it just me or am I the only one that feels that Dodge should've kept the styling of the rear quarter panels on the 2009 models (the only part of that model year that I do like) in with the restyling of the 2011 model?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4637785 Rear quarter panel of the '11 for a point of comparison
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
they should have just stopped making it
nyan !91iMi6CIYI
Quoted By:
Looks nice, but to make it flow with the rest of the car they had to lose a lot of window and impact visibility a bit. I hate function-be-damned styling. (see: new camaro...) New Charger looks fine in that department, imo.
v-v !KvOCOKjkNc
Quoted By:
Anonymous
Quoted By:
i got these up in my car. shits nice bro.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Always have been a gm guy but the 64 galaxie with a 427 inside just will always scream sleeper suprise to me.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
galaxies are fackin sweet. was cruising next to a '66 with a 428 and god damn i wanted one so bad
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I don't get when people call old cars sleepers. I mean, if it's still on the road then it must be something special. Any time I see a car pre 70s I expect it to be a beast.
