>>6134594lol why is it so important of you to pretend this is an "argument"? I am not "arguing" with you, that would imply that I am entertaining your point of view while trying to convince you of mine. that isn't what this is. I am stating facts, not "arguing" with riff raff lol. I am lecturing, not debating.
also, while you seem to dislike quotes, you can't dispute that Mr Armstrong clearly is in my camp on this issue. I'd say Louis Armstrong is a better judge of art than you are.
>>6134597Yes. I am smarter than "81 million" retards. what a surprise. also, I doubt many of those 81 million people would count gen 3 as their favorite pokemon game, just cause they bought it doesn't mean they like it better. I played it too, and obviously i don't like it much, after all.
