>>424937610why should we argue? I have read her work and found it pleasant and smart - accepting that one writing in fair isolation roughly 150 years ago aught not be held to post-modern standards
you have read her work [?] and decided it is suffocatingly tired
I might argue that it is writers like herself whose work with such ideas has been necessary for one to find them stuffy now, that there is value in this
i might back this up with examples of now-clichéd ideas ever-present and iterated on throughout the Greeks, Hellenised Jews, Torah, Latin, Gospel, Shakespeare and on
I might make some silly closing 'witticism' like 'you're just too cool to be schooled', which, by dint of its being cliché, sums up the intractability of our positions
but I won't, this is /b/ faggot (also, what I had typed was lost by this faggot quick reply box, so you just get the hastily arrayed craptaculence)
>>424937568>pick oneno accounting for taste
(not that there's anything wrong with O'hara)