>>448422589>can you explain how you plan on doing that?first of all, it is not me planning to do that. I was merely the second in succession in terms of founding and moderating it. Also one of the most productive in making written material.
As United citizens have national chapters, there are two levels: Global and national.
Policy may differ between global and national.
But in any case many people cooperates in creating the policy. The fact the forum is empty nowadays, and as you propose the "ball to roll again" idk, I kinda lack the will and I suppose many other too, which leads us to your questions:
>is that through current systems that exist? or new systems that you would create? do you think the current political systems are flawed?First through current system. Legally and following the standards and wits of today's politics both internationally and globally as well as nationally on the level of national chapters treating every country respectfully. As it is in the end an international political movement.
After the hypothetical acquiring of the two thirds or a majority in a national legislative body, among other reforms would be revamping the whole system with emphasis on optimization, automation and prevention with a special care about inherent rights of living beings in a humanistic worldview, such as religious, sexual, civil etc.
So yes new systems would be created but with big help from semantics, integrated information and paperwork systems, AI and various other emerging technologies.
Yes, the system is flawed, personally I think the reason is the state in which the humanity is right now in terms of evolution as a species, inherently also affecting their surroundings, as the civilization progresses, the flaws are dealt with. The civilizations can also be regressing or even completely wiped out in events such as occur every often due to catastrophic changes or anomalies. As a representative, politically I cannot comment, only my personal opinion.