>>1635302>>1635303...You're overreacting. There was nothing in here that was more questionable than the contents of your typical Horo/Holo thread here on /c/.
A penetration pic was posted in this thread, you say? The catgirl one, I presume, because I noticed it myself. But it was here since the day this thread started, which was weeks before Christmas of last year. How do you supposed that was possible? Maybe because it was unnoticeable even in full view mode? You literally had to stare at the image for 30 seconds to realize something "fishy", albeit cute, was happening almost outside of the boundaries/dimensions of the image. And let's not even mention the thumbnail view.
It wasn't even worth pointing out. Innocent, even. I only noticed it because I was familiar with the image. That's why I didn't bitch about it like you're doing now.
Lighten the hell up.