>>4404941Awesome, I'll add that into the chart too! Thanks.
>>4404956Oh no! I must have accidentally left those out! Thank you for catching my error! The old chart was so busy that it was hard keeping the grids in line. I may have made mistakes elsewhere also! Thank you for checking that for me.
>>4405033If she looks rather pear-shaped, and has small ribs/bust, then she is still a pear. Not many people fit perfectly into a category, and you'd want to pick what she is most like. Now if she is sensitive about those shoulders and feels like they are far too out of proportion, the advice for inverted triangle will help her minimize those shoulders. From measurements alone she sounds like a rectangle, but she may be especially slender at the backside, enough so that her front has wide hips.
>>4405081You sound like you are between shapes. Your numbers are fairly rectangular, leaning towards hourglass, but your body likes to store weight in a pear fashion. If you got skinnier you would likely be rectangle and if you got heavier you would be a pear. If your body has a well-defined waist from a from view, you are an hourglass, but the numbers sound like a lean rectangle.
>>4405486Round-type is the most common way of storing fat in most races, with weight distributed throughout the torso, but also in the thighs/breasts. A rail-thin girl who retains larger breasts and shapely hips but an undefined waist (even with a flat belly) would be round. It's not fat women-exclusive, but can make an otherwise thin girl look larger than she is.
