>>7673154The point, though, is that every living human has enough potentially hazardous or even lethal recessive genes that making any such comparison is moot at best. By definition,
being "attractive" and "intelligent" etc are simple terms used to describe a whole gamut of rather unrelated traits. Moreover, they are comparison words. A person is attractive only in comparison to his peers, essentially. By which I mean, George Clooney is definitely better looking than the average /v/irgin. But is he every woman's ideal? Are there women that might find, say, Brad Pitt more attractive?
And as for having a creative mind without unstable tendencies, many if not most of the most brilliant and influential people throughout history have had pretty severe mental illnesses. Autism, bipolar, narcissism and OCD being the most common. Stable, well-centered people don't separate from the pack.
Moral of the story: you've been reading too many eugenics manuals from 1910. Shit aint as clear cut as you'd believe.
>>7673164Now you're just waiting for someone to make a men then/men now macro. In the 1400s you;d have been a glorious knight, but are now but a lowly peasant building houses! What a pathetic descent!