>>17257874Microsoft, in particular the Office team, has experience with developing new fonts and typesets. They too have the incentive to dedicate their full-time to developing these fonts and how they interact. Microsoft has the time and money to invest into this, where as Linux developers do not.
And who ever said font rendering was essential? Everything is very readable without strain, perhaps it lacks "elegance" but that is a vanity issue not a practical and performance issue. I would assume you'd criticize Windows for the practical and performance issues over a vanity issue such as fonts, perhaps I was wrong to keep my faith in humanity.
And, yes, you can put Windows fonts into Linux if you wish. But honestly, being a lazy leech like yourself, I highly doubt anything I say will change your mind. You'll just continue to trololol, not contribute code, nor offer incentive for the developers to focus on fonts.