Quoted By:
can prove the intent is here in any case a search warrant only required for the initial suspicion for suggesting that the accused has versachafft possession of child pornography magazines. The fact that he has already visited a page with child pornographic image content, ranging from a factual basis. A detailed Tatkonkretisierung must consist of the circumstances that justify the suspicion, not surrender (Bundesverfassungsgericht, Order of 28.09.2008 - 2 BvR 1800/07) öö9. After genetic detective experience is assumed that the accused can occupy only the children of the non-intentional, is certainly a necessary beginning for the search only if it suspected that the accused has versachafft possession of child pornography magazines. The fact that he has already visited a page with child pornographic image content, ranging from a factual basis. A detailed Tatkonkretisierung must consist of the circumstances that justify the suspicion, not surrender (Bundesverfassungsgericht, Order of 28.09.2008 - 2 BvR 1800/07). After genetic detective experience is assumed that the suspect only the non-child-pornographic writings that were at the above inter beziebar page, but also, other image files like holding stock and therefore the search for finding out the evidence.
The search and seizure are not disproportionate to the gravity of the offense and the strength of suspicion.
rpornographischen writings of the above were inter beziebar page, but also, other image files like holding stock and therefore the search leads to the discovery of evidence.
The search and seizure are not disproportionate to the gravity of the offense and the strength of suspicion.
The costs are based on a corresponding application of section 465 para 1 Code of Criminal Procedure.
Schweikart Presiding Judge, District Court
Gusinde judge at LG