/g/ - Technology » Thread #17277181

[196 / 13 / ?]

107KiB, 500x369, unknown.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:14:00 No.17277181 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>17277230 >>17277260 >>17277274 >>17279231

ITT: /g/ discusses the specs of the next-gen consoles to be released at ~2013.

GOGOGO

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 344KiB, 625x600

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:17:00 No.17277206 Report

Quoted By:

>Implying Sony isn't going bankrupt
>Implying the next Xbox won't be out until 2016
>Implying the new nintendo console isn't going to kick ass

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:17:00 No.17277214 Report

Quoted By: >>17278287

try 2015. Unless you mean the new nintendo console but that's just going to be a wii that can output upscaled 480p content with some controllers that look like gameboy advances. Real consoles won't be refreshed for another four years.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:17:00 No.17277215 Report

Quoted By:

iPad 3, same specs as iPad 2, but in white.

It will outsell every other console on the market.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:19:00 No.17277230 Report

Quoted By: >>17277895

>>17277181
>PSquad is a pyramid

Sony industrial designers confirmed for gradeschoolers.

BluX !c7ejyr/RUk

BluX !c7ejyr/RUk Tue 03 May 2011 01:19:00 No.17277231 Report

Quoted By:

Still waiting for Dreamcast 2.
PS4 won't run Linux for sure, so it's irrelevant.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:19:00 No.17277233 Report

Quoted By:

Next generation of consoles won't focus in specs but gimmicks. Other than that they'll be just like current gen consoles except with proper HD support. Expect a disappointment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:21:00 No.17277260 Report

Quoted By: >>17277273

>>17277181
Not happening, both sony and microsoft are pretty firm about their "12 year life cycle" shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 30KiB, 300x300

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:21:00 No.17277263 Report

Quoted By: >>17277976

Why on earth do people think the PS4 would look like that.

Guess what the controller will look like. Image related.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:22:00 No.17277273 Report

Quoted By: >>17277286 >>17277287

>>17277260

Microsoft has confirmed a new console for 2013~. A quick check on their jobs will reinforce just that, they're looking for hardware architects for "next gen games consoles"

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 2MiB, 1397x751

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:22:00 No.17277274 Report

Quoted By: >>17277292

>>17277181
consoles are for peasants
emulators mater race

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:23:00 No.17277286 Report

Quoted By: >>17277295 >>17277934

>>17277273
They haven't confirmed SHIT and I have it on very good authority that the next xbox will be a 360 with the kinect unit built-in. There will not be a new xbox (with improved hardware) until 2015 at the earliest.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:23:00 No.17277287 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277273
And I'm looking for someone to make a baby with, but shit ain't gonna pop out for at least nine months, because
>herpaderp the moment htey get hired they'll have finished the product they were hired to develop.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 28KiB, 512x384

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:24:00 No.17277292 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277274
I bawled my eyes out at that part

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:24:00 No.17277295 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277286

ok, I trust you Mr. Ballmer. Now go and hide under your bridge, let the grownups talk.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:26:00 No.17277321 Report

Quoted By: >>17277358

>mfw project cafe will outsell the competition easy again

also the ps4 wont be out until 2016 and the xbawx might get a new model in late 2014 at the earliest

Seriously though why do we care when nintendo is the only game company left anyways. They know what we want and they're right.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:26:00 No.17277325 Report

Quoted By: >>17277336

>>17277308
gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry and revenues increase exponentially every year with no sign of a decrease. I doubt you know what you're talking about. Gaming is pretty fucking far from a crash like we saw in the early 80s.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:26:00 No.17277326 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277308
The fuck are you talking about copycat games? We only get original blockbuster titles lately like Cowwa Doodie and Nurd fur Spurd

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:27:00 No.17277336 Report

Quoted By: >>17277391

>>17277308

>this generation's E.T.

I'm actually convinced that'll be a CoD game. I'm sure Activision will release a cod for a few more years, gradually getting worse and worse but selling more and more, until one year it just doesn't sell, at all, leaving tens of millions of copies of that doing nothing.

>>17277325

1983 called. That's what Atari said.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:28:00 No.17277358 Report

Quoted By: >>17277389

>>17277321
I;m not really interested in playing another release of super mario 64/OoT or super smash brothers. Nintendo is boring and played out and they mostly seem to be concerned with nostalgia gamers and little kids now. But then again I guess they always were it's just that I grew out of it.

Honestly nintendo is the console equavalent of Apple - their customers buy it just for the name alone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:29:00 No.17277381 Report

Quoted By:

/g/ - Video Games

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:30:00 No.17277389 Report

Quoted By: >>17277404

>>17277358
>grew out of it

Then what did you grow into?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:30:00 No.17277391 Report

Quoted By: >>17277406

>>17277336
>1983 called. That's what Atari said.
That's not even close to what Atari said, the arcades were in decline for years before the full drop and Atari, seeing the inevitable drop tried to branch out into home entertainment, that's why even today it's one of the handful of companies that still exist and grows, so before you pull shit out of your ass, try to know something about it first.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:32:00 No.17277404 Report

Quoted By: >>17277450

>>17277389
I dunno. I still like to play the classics (Snes and NeoGeo/Arcade) so it's not like I'm not a nostalgia gamer but as far as modern gaming goes I would take a western-style RPG over a japanese platformer or fighting game. I like more complicated games now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:32:00 No.17277406 Report

Quoted By: >>17277424 >>17277436 >>17277457

>>17277391
>arcades were in decline
Nope, arcades did just fine after the videogame crash, as did computers like the C64. It was just shitty consoles like the 2600 and Intellivision that crashed and burned, and we have the same fucking shit today.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:34:00 No.17277424 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277406
Consoles are doing just fine, it's a growing market for heavens sake.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:34:00 No.17277436 Report

Quoted By: >>17277458

>>17277406
You are seriously ill informed. Consoles have never been more profitable than they are right now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:35:00 No.17277450 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277404
>complicated

To each their own I guess, I'm more of a story kinda guy myself.

Then again the only reason I play games at all is to see the credits. I like easy accomplishments :3

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:35:00 No.17277454 Report

Quoted By: >>17277502 >>17278309

>No backwards compatibility

>$400+ launch price for both Sony and MS

>They become even more glorified HTPC's than they are now

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:36:00 No.17277457 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277406
>Nope, arcades did just fine
nigger are you for real? the arcade are a shadow of their former glory, the entire reason for the home conole market was because of the arcade decline, and if you're talking about this imaginary home console crash of yours, shit never happened, those conoles never had that great of a sales to begin with because they were expensive as fuck all.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:36:00 No.17277458 Report

Quoted By: >>17277468

>>17277436
They were profitable back before the crash, too.

Some kid needs to learn some fucking videogame history.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:36:00 No.17277468 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277458
hahah oh wow

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:38:00 No.17277502 Report

Quoted By: >>17277514 >>17277568

>>17277454
Good thing my next nintendo console can play Wii games amiright?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:39:00 No.17277514 Report

Quoted By: >>17277546 >>17277585

>>17277502
Wait.... the next nintendo console is wii.... its just wii1.5

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:42:00 No.17277546 Report

Quoted By: >>17277575 >>17277585

>>17277514
Its going to make the next big innovation in console gaming mark my words.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:42:00 No.17277561 Report

Quoted By:

Will it have google integration for indexing user data?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:43:00 No.17277568 Report

Quoted By: >>17277649

>>17277502
That's because the Wii is easily emulated in software because it's roughly as powerful as the PS2.

You can't emulate the Cell in software as processing power required for emulation increases exponentially with the power of the chip you're trying to emulate.

The Cell can do around 230 gflops in single point precision.

The Broadway CPU in the Wii can do 2.9 gflops...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:43:00 No.17277575 Report

Quoted By: >>17277615

>>17277546
Yes, disc-shaped waggle!!!!

DarkTrip !nNThBA7CKU

DarkTrip !nNThBA7CKU Tue 03 May 2011 01:44:00 No.17277583 Report

Quoted By:

the aren't going to be released anywhere near 2013.
itll be LATE 2014 earliest. expect nintendo obv but they dont count

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:44:00 No.17277585 Report

Quoted By: >>17277646

>>17277514
Yes. The only internal difference is the GPU, with the ability to upscale current titles and display new titles in HD resolutions. Also, the wiimote is being replaced with a motion-sensitive controller that is similar to a gameboy advance.
>>17277546
No it isn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:46:00 No.17277615 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277575
Too bad most of their heavy hitters don't even use waggle controls. Well the new zelda will buts I think thats just because they failed so hard with Twilight Princess' controls.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:48:00 No.17277646 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277585
Well they have been for the last 2 decades.

The only thing they didn't jump on right away was Compact Discs and Online play.

They pioneered motion control because everyone was too scared. Now that that's out of they way and 3D has been taken out of the picture I honestly am a little curious to say the least.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:49:00 No.17277649 Report

Quoted By: >>17277666 >>17277767

>>17277568
Forgot to add, the PS2 CPU does 6.2 gflops.

I always forget how pathetic the Wii's hardware is. It must cost pennies to source at this point.

The GPU has 27mb (24mb and 3mb high speed) of dedicated VRAM, total RAM is 64mb, and a CPU is nothing more than an overclocked chip dating back to 1999. Everything is on ancient 90nm processes too so yields must be near 100%.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:50:00 No.17277666 Report

Quoted By: >>17277729

>>17277649
Gameplay > Graphics

justsaiyan.png

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:51:00 No.17277686 Report

Quoted By:

Nintendo best be serious about adding real home theater features to the Wii successor.

The vast majority of Wii owners had fun with Wii Sports and Fit and see absolutely no reason to buy another wagglin' console. I have no reason to buy a console from them if it can't at least match the capabilities of the PS3 in terms of media playback and storage capacity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:53:00 No.17277719 Report

Quoted By: >>17277745 >>17277783

>mfw nintendo consoles has always been vastly underpowered compared to the competition yet still sell far more

Well maybe not the gamecube... I still enjoyed quite a few games on it though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:54:00 No.17277729 Report

Quoted By: >>17277754 >>17277761 >>17277766

>>17277666
Gameplay does depend on hardware to a certain extent though. Resolution and shaders might not impact gameplay but available memory for maps, models, and entities sure does. Also processing power for advanced physics is important. I think it's ironic that we finally have motion controls for physical interaction with games but none of them offer realistic physics to interact with.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:55:00 No.17277745 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277719
The N64 was the more powerful console too, it was just hampered by poor hardware architecture decisions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:56:00 No.17277754 Report

Quoted By: >>17277788

>>17277729
there's that dodge ball game on kinect is there not?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:56:00 No.17277761 Report

Quoted By: >>17277798

>>17277729
Thats why its good Nintendo is finally stepping up to play with the big boys. Since it's going to have superior hardware I think things will get interesting when nintendo blows the roof off of E3 this year.

Can't wait to see xbros and sony...bros? to shit their pants.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:57:00 No.17277766 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277729
>advanced physics
So the 360 and PS3 suck too, eh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:57:00 No.17277767 Report

Quoted By: >>17277858 >>17277915

>>17277649

>The PS3 is pathetic.
>only 256MB dedicated VRAM
>only nvidia 7800-based
>Only 230GFlops

>mfw my computer had 3GB VRAM, 12GM main memory and does 1.5TFlops per GPU

Son, I don't think you know how hardware works.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:58:00 No.17277783 Report

Quoted By: >>17277810

>>17277719
The gamecube was destroyed by the competition, in terms of sales.
So was the N64 and the Virtual Boy. Before the Wii the last sucessful home console nintendo produced was the SNES. They're portable line is kicking the shit out of everyone but that's to be expected since the gameboy was synonomous with portable gaming in the early 90s.

Gaming has changed a lot in the last decade and I'm not sure that nintendo can compete on the same level as say, microsoft at this point. They have to do something about their online service, their media support and their 3rd party contributors BUT people have been saying this since like 2001 and nintendo hasn't budged at all so who fuckin' knows what they'll do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 01:58:00 No.17277788 Report

Quoted By: >>17277830

>>17277754
I'm thinking more along the lines of things like Euphoria Physics where you can have an enormous number of interactive free objects. A few free balls isn't too demanding.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 01:59:00 No.17277798 Report

Quoted By: >>17277848

>>17277761
>xbros and sony...bros?

GTFO out of here retard and gb2/v/ with your fankid nonsense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:00:00 No.17277810 Report

Quoted By: >>17277831

>>17277783
Thats why I said not the gamecube. The virtual boy was retarded. I'll give you the N64 though... It really didn't have much going for it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:01:00 No.17277830 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277788
.... well... you need a fun game scenario that's going to require that. your an idiot if you design games around a need to show off a specific hardware capability. not everyone gets a boner from watching a million physics simulated balls splashing around on the screen. Usually the best gameplay ideas are the simplest.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:02:00 No.17277831 Report

Quoted By: >>17277860 >>17277867

>>17277810
>implying there weren't a plethora of amazing games for the n64
There's a difference between a cheap dvd player and a cartridge gaming system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:03:00 No.17277848 Report

Quoted By: >>17277857

>>17277798
I apologize for trying to be civil. Next time I'll just use my neckbear dialect and fit in perfectly. Fucking faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:04:00 No.17277857 Report

Quoted By: >>17277920

>>17277848
>xbros and sony bros
That isn't civil, that's just stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:04:00 No.17277858 Report

Quoted By: >>17277935

>>17277767
The Cell is actually scary powerful compared to even the latest Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs. That's more a function of it being a glorified server CPU and the PowerPC architecture. I'm pretty sure the i5-2500 only gets around 80-90 gflops in Linpack.

The RAM allotment on the PS3 is pathetic though. The 512mb shared on the 360 was very up-to-date for a mid-range 2005 desktop. Even though 1gb was common, games were designed around having roughly 512mb free and the low-overhead version of XP that is used in the 360 leaves about that much.

You're right though, Sony is still probably kicking themselves over choosing to use the Cell, taking on the 7800GT at the last second (The Cell was supposed to handle GPU duty though but was too hard to port too), and skimping on RAM. It's a bad piece of hardware.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:04:00 No.17277860 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277831
So did the competition.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:04:00 No.17277867 Report

Quoted By: >>17277884

>>17277831
There were about a dozen "amazing" games (and some would argue, only half that) for the N64 and just hundreds of shit shovelware titles - just like any nintendo console.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:06:00 No.17277884 Report

Quoted By: >>17277928 >>17277929

>>17277867
And there were a dozen "amazing" games for the ps1, but it just also was a dvd player, the only thing that kept it alive.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 174KiB, 380x288

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:06:00 No.17277895 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277230
>Implying a pyramid doesn't have 4 visible sides

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:07:00 No.17277915 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277767
The Nvidia 7800GT was pretty up to date in 2006. It was bad timing for Sony though because G80 was the largest generation to generation GPU performance increase ever seen. The 8800 Ultra literally doubled and nearly tripled raw computing performance when compared to the 7950GT. These days you're lucky to get a 33% increase.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 399KiB, 1238x864

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:08:00 No.17277920 Report

Quoted By: >>17277959

>>17277857
So you think using terms across multiple boards is stupid?

pic related

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:08:00 No.17277928 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277884
>PS1

>DVD player

The PS1 was famous for being a popular CD player. The PS2 was the one that popularized DVD's.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:08:00 No.17277929 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277884
You're wrong and are clearly some kind of nintendo fanboy or something because anyone with a critical viewpoint of gaming during that time would be forced to admit that the PS1 had not only some of the most memorable and most impressive games at the time, it had hundreds of them.

Seriously, I was going to actually list some and then I realized it would be a huge waste of time for me to type out a hundred+ awesome playstation games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:08:00 No.17277934 Report

Quoted By: >>17277952 >>17277977

>>17277286
>kinect unit built-in

how the fuck does that work? you but the entire xbox 260 control on top or your tv?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:08:00 No.17277935 Report

Quoted By: >>17278031

>>17277858

>The Cell is actually scary powerful compared to even the latest Intel Sandy Bridge CPUs.

but only in terms of raw performance data. A budget GPU from 2006, in terms of floating point operations, will outperform a sandy bridge. That doesn't mean it's "faster".

And to note, "Faster" is a retarded way to define the overall performance of a *PU.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:10:00 No.17277952 Report

Quoted By: >>17277977

>>17277934
>360*

also, why did they do taht with the hardware revision the only made last year? where they added built in support for a kinect power supply?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:10:00 No.17277959 Report

Quoted By: >>17278027

>>17277920
No, the terms themselves are retarded. If you define yourself by what console you use, than you're not worth coming on /g/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:11:00 No.17277976 Report

Quoted By: >>17277992

>>17277263
Just like God intended.

Everyone thinks I'm crazy for liking the PS controller more than the 360 controller, but perhaps my hand bones have molded to fit the Dualshocks like a glove.

360 controller feels like I'm gripping two big potatoes.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:11:00 No.17277977 Report

Quoted By: >>17278094

>>17277934
The 360 internals and the kinect unit will be all-in-one. No I don't know the exact details but it's a real project.
>>17277952
Why would they?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:12:00 No.17277992 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277976
Perhaps you have tiny gimpy gook hands.

The dualshock design is terrible. Just terrible in all aspects.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:14:00 No.17278027 Report

Quoted By: >>17278066

>>17277959
First of all I use all 3. Mostly PC since because pirating. However, I do have a bias towards nintendo, but that doesn't change the fact that I play the Xbox 360 more than both the other consoles.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:14:00 No.17278031 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277935
You're comparing CPUs to GPUs though. The PS3 is far behind in GPU performance, that's clear. I just wanted to point out that it isn't complete crap. Even the GPU isn't too bad for 2006. The problem with the PS3 is that it has a supercomputer CPU with a mediocre GPU and no RAM for either chip. That and the difficulty in programming specifically for the Cell really hold back the capability of the raw processing power.

If you could go back in time and give the PS3 even 1gb of system RAM and 512mb of VRAM you'd be astounded at what it could pump out at 1280x720 (my friend still has a 7900GT and it runs most everything great at the shitty 1024x600 and 1280x720 resolutions console run at today).

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:16:00 No.17278066 Report

Quoted By: >>17278080

>>17278027
The terms are still retarded regardless of what you do or say.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:17:00 No.17278080 Report

Quoted By: >>17278098

>>17278066
Never said they weren't broseph.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:18:00 No.17278092 Report

Quoted By: >>17278112

the new Playstation 4 will be two PS3's sandwiched together

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:18:00 No.17278094 Report

Quoted By: >>17278123 >>17278138

>>17277977
sounds strange. the kinect will still need to be a seperate unit and have the camera and mics and motor in it. but persumably won't work with previous 360 consoles. maybe it will allow them to drop the price a lot or save money?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:18:00 No.17278098 Report

Quoted By: >>17278121

>>17278080
Then don't say it in /g/, as we're autism and will make fun of you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:19:00 No.17278112 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278092
You fucking idiot.

That would make it a PS6.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 8KiB, 493x402

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:20:00 No.17278121 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278098

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:20:00 No.17278123 Report

Quoted By: >>17278159 >>17278198

>>17278094
The 360 chipset is at a 32nm or even 28nm process at this point so there is a really really good chance that they can fit the 360 internals AND the kinect internals into one chassis. That's probably the idea.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:21:00 No.17278129 Report

Quoted By: >>17278167

ITT: poorfags think consoles will last another 4 years because they just got around to being able to afford one.

Sorry faggots, microsoft stated 2011-2012 target years ago for their next console and Nintendo has already initiated the generation change, get used to it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:21:00 No.17278137 Report

Quoted By: >>17278152

game consoles are dead.

the real advances in gaming will be on iOS devices.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:21:00 No.17278138 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278094
or maybe they're making the xbox fit inside the kinect

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:21:00 No.17278146 Report

Quoted By:

>yfw Sony peaked with the PS2 and will never make a good console again

>yfw PS4 will be awful, only slightly boosted by a few exclusive title series (Gran Turismo, Killzone etc.)

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:22:00 No.17278152 Report

Quoted By: >>17278169

>>17278137
iOS devices are game consoles.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:22:00 No.17278159 Report

Quoted By: >>17278251

>>17278123
i get that. i just don't see the gain of doing that. given for example they appear to have gone through some effort to ensure the kinect would work with the new revision of the 360 and the original one, despite the fact the the new one had the kinect power supply built in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:23:00 No.17278167 Report

Quoted By: >>17278221

>>17278129
Microsoft only released the kinect last year - that is their hardware refresh and it'll give the 360 another three years at least. Your troll-fu is weak.

SpecialOps !!qJE0eowz3JD

SpecialOps !!qJE0eowz3JD Tue 03 May 2011 02:23:00 No.17278169 Report

Quoted By: >>17278193

>>17278152
niggayoubeserious?.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:25:00 No.17278192 Report

Quoted By: >>17278214 >>17278245

sony will have the PS4 with an open firmware on release and will remove that feature in the first update. the next update will be removal of PS3 compatibility.

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:25:00 No.17278193 Report

Quoted By: >>17278205 >>17278206 >>17278212

>>17278169
Yeah, I am. What else are they? The most commonly used apps on iOS devices are games.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:25:00 No.17278198 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278123
So everyone who buys the new 360 will have to put it right under their TV.

Right...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:26:00 No.17278205 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278193

That makes Android a game console as well.

SpecialOps !!qJE0eowz3JD

SpecialOps !!qJE0eowz3JD Tue 03 May 2011 02:26:00 No.17278206 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278193
I wouldn't care was just asking.

I'm outties.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:26:00 No.17278212 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278193
Portable media devices. Games are media, but the main purpose of the iPod Touch is not games, but all the portable media it can acquire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:26:00 No.17278214 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278192
I'm laughing right now, but I'm pretty sure that I won't be when Sony actually does this...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:27:00 No.17278221 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278167
When sales continue to drop because no one who owns a 360 givesafuck about kinect gimmicks they sure as hell will push out a new console.

Nintendo said awhile ago that they would release a new console when their current one stops being profitable, if they're moving forward I doubt competitors will be far behind. The target demographic for 360/PS3 are console graphics whores, when the new nintendo console is more graphically impressive Microsoft and Sony will lose sales.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:27:00 No.17278228 Report

Quoted By:

>PS4 with holographic nano storage drives
>Can store up to 500 TB
>Games still fit on a DVD
>Sony fails again

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:28:00 No.17278245 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278192
why did sony even include that feature in the first place? it sounds like a very un-sony thing to do, nahmsayin?

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6

!nINteNdOOM!!iGjUlpyaUF6 Tue 03 May 2011 02:29:00 No.17278251 Report

Quoted By: >>17278360

>>17278159
The kinect is a gamble and microsoft is not going to commit to it with the first launch so they ensured it worked with current hardware.

Don't forget that 4 years ago MS launched the HDDVD addon and they also intended to internalize that if it was a success.

The new 360 "slim" revision helps them clear out old materials too.

The plan has always been that if the kinect was a success microsoft would combine the two devices and sell that as their console. The chassis won't enlarge must past the current size of the kinect and it will be just one device that sits on top of or below your television.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:30:00 No.17278271 Report

Quoted By: >>17278300

PS4

512MB of system ram
Cell processors at 9 GHz and 27 SPes but still cant be coded for and is useless because LOL NO RAM
nvidia 8800 based 6 year old GPU with 256MB or ram
Blu-ray drive at -6X

Next Xbox
Quad core at 3.5GHz+
2GB of shared system ram
The current top end ATI card(maybe slightly neutered)
Blu-ray drive at 6X

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:31:00 No.17278278 Report

Quoted By: >>17278297

Sony is also being royally fucked by piracy and PSN cheating because of the shitty security on their system, any asshat can install CFW 3.55 put games on an external hard drive or install a package that allows them to cheat like a motherfucker online. It makes the most sense for Sony to rush a new console now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:31:00 No.17278287 Report

Quoted By: >>17278311 >>17278334 >>17278348

>>17277214
>PS4
>2015
>look back at history of playstation

>Playstation - 1994
>Playstation 2 - 2000
>Playstation 3 - 2006
>implying playstation 4 won't logically be released in 2012

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:32:00 No.17278297 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278278
They don't need a new console, they simply need to increase their online security.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:32:00 No.17278300 Report

Quoted By: >>17278451

>>17278271

forgot to mention that the PS4 will have no backwards compatibility and the Xbox will have full backwards compatibility with upscaling to 1080p and 8xAA on original 360 titles.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 95KiB, 337x404

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:33:00 No.17278309 Report

Quoted By: >>17278342

>>17277454
mfw the next Playstation won't play DVDs, MP3s or any other form of offline media it will only play games downloaded from the cloud

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:33:00 No.17278311 Report

Quoted By: >>17278362 >>17278453

>>17278287
>implying ps4 won't be released in 2013 or 2014
They don't get a console out in less than a year.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:34:00 No.17278334 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278287
>the would will end when sony releases a new console
that figures, good job sony

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:34:00 No.17278342 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278309

>yfw Sony is not Apple

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:35:00 No.17278348 Report

Quoted By: >>17278378 >>17278383

>>17278287
They'll release it around the same time Microsoft releases their next system. They don't want to pull a Dreamcast by rushing a system out early then BAM out comes the new XBox two years later with hardware that's 10x more powerful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:35:00 No.17278356 Report

Quoted By:

ill just leave this here

http://kotaku.com/#!5794000/microsoft-and-sony-targeting-2014-for-new-consoles-leaving-nintendo-in-t
he-clear

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:35:00 No.17278360 Report

Quoted By: >>17278394

>>17278251
>The chassis won't enlarge much past the current size of the kinect and it will be just one device that sits on top of or below your television.

erm... how are you gunno fit a dvd srive and into all that? also having a shitload of cables comming out the bacl of it. It seems even if it was impressively small it would be still way too fucking big and messy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:35:00 No.17278362 Report

Quoted By: >>17278386

>>17278311
Xbox 360 - Unveiled May 12, 2005, released November 22, 2005.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:36:00 No.17278378 Report

Quoted By: >>17278484

>>17278348
That's not what happened with the dreamcast - it's hardware was even more powerful compared to the PS2 and the gamecube,

The dreamcast was killed by a combination of piracy and terrible marketing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:36:00 No.17278383 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278348
Good thing we're at the point where hardware doesn't matter anymore. Next gen consoles are then end of the line guys.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:36:00 No.17278386 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278362
>comparing microsoft to sony

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:37:00 No.17278394 Report

Quoted By: >>17278424 >>17278427 >>17278473 >>17278500

>>17278360
They probably won't. It'll all be direct download games from XBL. Everyone really wants to move away from optical storage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:38:00 No.17278421 Report

Quoted By:

If either Microsoft or Sony choose the "profitable on day one" route I won't be purchasing that console, ever. It's bad enough advacement has been held back by consoles, but to re-release shitty hardware from 2005 in 2013 with a built in kinect? fuck that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:39:00 No.17278424 Report

Quoted By: >>17278448

>>17278394
and that's the beginning of the end. imagine, everything is on the cloud, and if you read the fine print you really don't own any of it. you're paying for a license to use software that they can legally withdraw at any time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:39:00 No.17278427 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278394
Also there doesn't have to be a "shit ton" of cabling - power and HDMI is all you'd need. The powerbrick will still probably be external though since it's such a heat factory and really tough to shrink down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:40:00 No.17278448 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278424
So you don't use Steam? or Youtube?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:40:00 No.17278451 Report

Quoted By: >>17278543 >>17278646

>>17278300
>Microsoft
>Backwards compatibility

HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:40:00 No.17278453 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278311
>implying they can't be developing it now 'quietly' and have a good product to show next january and launch next fall/winter

I didn't say early 2012

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:40:00 No.17278456 Report

Quoted By: >>17278524

Playstation 4

CPU: Cell Processor (2PPE cores, 12 SPEs)
GPU: Middle end video card, 1gig VRAM
RAM: 4gigs
Harddrive: SATA HDs, SSDs still an option for consumers

Comments: The Playstation 3 already sets the precedent for it's successor in 3 ways:

1) Cell processor is necessary to maintain BC with PS3 games.
2) Cell processor investment cost Sony at least 3 billion dollars, it will not be swept under the rug so lightly.
3) The 3D gimmick is here to stay but will be optional. Regardless the console itself needs enough power to do 1080p @ 60FPS.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:41:00 No.17278473 Report

Quoted By: >>17278499 >>17278513

>>17278394
uuuuhh... well that would be a brand new platform then wouldn't it? also don't imagine microsoft trying to sell something like that and have there so many games that owners cant buy because they're not fully downloadable. and that still only saves the dvd drive. you still have a ass load of wires going out the back including the heavy powersupply cable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:42:00 No.17278484 Report

Quoted By: >>17278531

>>17278378
I thought the Dreamcast was killed more by a lack of developers as costs couldn't be shared by porting games to the far less powerful PS1 and N64?

Sure it had a ton of great Japanese developers but the US is the key target market for consoles and locally targeted games like Tony Hawk Pro Skater are what drive mass market sales. The Dreamcast library wasn't culturally relevant to the US.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:43:00 No.17278499 Report

Quoted By: >>17278581

>>17278473
>ass load of wires
>power and hdmi

oh wow you must still think wireless cant be used for gaming

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:43:00 No.17278500 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278394
Not if the big retailers like Wal Mart and Target have anything to say about it.

Don't underestimate their sway on the consumer culture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:43:00 No.17278513 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278473
Eventually, and by eventually I mean by the next generation of consoles, optical drives will be gone. It'll all be direct download ala Valve's Steam.

And as for cabling, it happens. What's the difference from any other device? They all require cables.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:44:00 No.17278524 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278456
They're lucky the Cell is still considered powerful enough. IBM has ended all development of that architecture so they're stuck with the Cell as-is for all eternity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:45:00 No.17278531 Report

Quoted By: >>17278587

>>17278484
>Sure it had a ton of great Japanese developers
Probably the reason they were still making games for it into 2007. Fucking hardcore.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:46:00 No.17278543 Report

Quoted By: >>17278604

>>17278451
>Backwards compatibility

>HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

implying windows 7 doesn't still run windows 3.1 applications natively.
Implying microsoft doesn't respect the benefit of backwards compatibility more than any company in the world.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:48:00 No.17278580 Report

Quoted By:

I bet the next playstation will run on x86 hardware. Maybe something equivalent in hardware powah to a Core i5 dual core and a GTX460. Of course, it'll still be capable of graphics that far surpass a i7 PC with SLI GTX 580s because code doesn't have to run through pigdisgusting APIs like DirectX.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:48:00 No.17278581 Report

Quoted By: >>17278599

>>17278499
okay, so on top of removing the optical drive you also require a tv that takes wireless hdmi.

>the new revison of xbox 360: you can;t buy most xbox games for it, it has no improved hardware specifications, it most liekly doens;t work on you current tv either, why did we make this again?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:48:00 No.17278587 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278531
Sega has a huge cultural following in Japan because they were THE arcade company and arcade gaming was the primary form of the hobby until this decade.

The Dreamcast is basically the Japanese Commodore 64 or Ti-84. They are icons of hardware and people just don't stop making software for them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:49:00 No.17278597 Report

Quoted By:

3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D 3D NEEDS MOAR 3D

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:49:00 No.17278599 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278581
No I was saying that 2 wires isnt many at all and you must be a retard that still thinks he need every thing plugged in via ethernet at all times.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:50:00 No.17278604 Report

Quoted By: >>17278647

>>17278543
Windows 7 x64 does not have the 16-bit subsystem, so only the 32-bit Windows 3.1 programs will work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:52:00 No.17278644 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278613
Not everyone does. Many love it because it is easy to program for and you can use DirectX for the 360

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:53:00 No.17278646 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278451

Microsoft requires all developers to code the game through the directX API and cant make their own custom API.

The next xbox will likely be 100% backwards compatible with 360 games because the next xbox will 99% likely be based on the latest version of directX.

Where as sony lets developers do what ever they want, so unless the next playstation has a cell processor and an nvidia based GPU, then your PS3 games will likely not run.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:53:00 No.17278647 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278604
but windows 7 32-bit does. yeah?

also suspect you may be missing my point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:54:00 No.17278662 Report

Quoted By: >>17278682 >>17278702 >>17278744 >>17278758 >>17278791

>>17278613
basic rule is you need to have a computer with far more processing power than a game console to have equivalent eye-candy because you can't run low-level code in a windows environment.

think of how fast a program written in assembly is compared to something like java.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:56:00 No.17278682 Report

Quoted By: >>17278706

>>17278662
>eye candy
>comparing 1600p 32AA highest everything to 600p no AA, low or medium everything
Yes, consoles look better than a PC.

haiku

haiku Tue 03 May 2011 02:57:00 No.17278702 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278662
Rollercoaster VS Minecraft? Rollercoaster VS Minecraft.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:57:00 No.17278706 Report

Quoted By: >>17278723 >>17278730

>>17278682
You totally missed the point, idiot. Go sit in the corner.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:59:00 No.17278723 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278706
just another retarded and buttfrustrated pc gaymar

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 02:59:00 No.17278730 Report

Quoted By: >>17278743 >>17278745 >>17278969

>>17278706
>buy used 9600, q6600 with other like parts for $150
>same or better graphics as new 360/ps3
Oh okay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:00:00 No.17278743 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278730
Stop posting retard. Holy shit do you know how to read???

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:00:00 No.17278744 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278662
So you have to pay more... to get better graphics? NO FUCKING WAY, I NEVER WOULD'VE GUESSED THAT!

Go back to>>>/v/.

haiku

haiku Tue 03 May 2011 03:00:00 No.17278745 Report

Quoted By: >>17278760

>>17278730
>>>/v/
We aren't talking about bang for buck or shit like that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:01:00 No.17278758 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278662
generally speaking only neckbeards care about this. the loss of performance to DirectX is not massive compared to the gains in relaiblity of code. no one wants their game to have 5% more polygons but crash half the time. on the pc it also makes games work reliably across different GPUs so long as they support the required version of directX. On the 360 it saves time and money by allowing develoeprs to easly target both pc and xbox with largely the same codebase. it allows people to make good games faster. it fixes problems games developers care about. games develoeprs care about getting their game idea to as many people as they can as sheaply and easily as they can and not have to worry about technical fetishes. you can always write a game in assemply and get a nice performance increase, but you could get a far better game made in the game amount of time using things like directX and C++ so long you can afford to shave about 10% of the polygons off your models or so.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:01:00 No.17278760 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278745
>you can't get same graphics without paying more
>get same/better graphics paying less
So what are we talking about?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:04:00 No.17278791 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278662
Makes no difference, as computer hardware is cheap enough so that you can get more processing power than an Xbox at the equivalent price.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 136KiB, 960x540

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:19:00 No.17278969 Report

Quoted By: >>17278989 >>17279031 >>17279036

>>17278730

This game runs on what is essentially a 733MHz Pentium 3 PC with 64MB of RAM. Maybe it'll help you visualize what the real issue is...it really just boils down to efficiency.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:21:00 No.17278989 Report

Quoted By: >>17278997 >>17279013

>>17278969
[citation needed]

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:22:00 No.17278997 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278989
wat?

It's just Ninja Gaiden Black on Xbox.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:22:00 No.17279013 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278989
The specs of the original Xbox?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:24:00 No.17279031 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278969
don't wanna get all /v/ in this thread, but ninja gaiden fuck yeah! best xbox game ever.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:24:00 No.17279036 Report

Quoted By:

>>17278969
File1304363988.jpg-(139 KB, 960x540, ninjagaiden_ninjadog.jpg)
>960x540
Oh okay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:28:00 No.17279081 Report

Quoted By:

I think the next playstation should have the same CPU with an upgraded graphics chip and more memory. I doubt sony is that smart though, they will find a way to mess it up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:30:00 No.17279107 Report

Quoted By: >>17279118 >>17279164

I want Samsung to make a console. Samsung is best technology company.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:31:00 No.17279118 Report

Quoted By: >>17279139

>>17279107
>samsung
>console
they're happy enough making parts for things and a few of their own assorted devices already

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:32:00 No.17279129 Report

Quoted By: >>17279164 >>17279177 >>17279227

I want Apple to make a console. Apple is best technology company.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:32:00 No.17279139 Report

Quoted By: >>17279169

>>17279118
Yeah but if they made a console it would be the greetest console because Samsung is best technology company.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:33:00 No.17279153 Report

Quoted By: >>17279167 >>17279170

What specs would you need to emulate current gen consoles and when would buying a PC with those specs be viable?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:34:00 No.17279164 Report

Quoted By: >>17279235

>>17279107here
>>17279129
lolno
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_global_technology_companies

>Rank Company name 2009 Revenue
>1 Samsung Electronics $117,400m
>14 Apple Inc. $42,910m

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:34:00 No.17279167 Report

Quoted By: >>17279211

>>17279153
Or you could just like buy a console.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:34:00 No.17279169 Report

Quoted By: >>17279241

>>17279139

Samsung doesn't have what it takes to make a successful console.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:34:00 No.17279170 Report

Quoted By: >>17279211

>>17279153
>emulating current gen consoles
nope.png
either get the PC port of something or just use the console

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:34:00 No.17279177 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279129
Endless sea of shovelware.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:36:00 No.17279204 Report

Quoted By: >>17279308 >>17279352

If Apple made a console, what would their 'flagship' game franchise be? Microsoft has Halo, Nintendo has Mario, Sony has Gran Turismo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:36:00 No.17279211 Report

Quoted By: >>17279225

>>17279170
>>17279167
When though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:37:00 No.17279225 Report

Quoted By: >>17279269

>>17279211
When someone makes an emulator. There is no timeframe.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 41KiB, 450x338

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:37:00 No.17279227 Report

Quoted By: >>17279240

>>17279129
their console was called pippin, can't get much better then that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:37:00 No.17279231 Report

Quoted By:

>>17277181
Can't wait to cook some eggs on that overheating hazard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:38:00 No.17279235 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279164
>revenue vs profits

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:39:00 No.17279240 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279227
They will release one in white next.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:39:00 No.17279241 Report

Quoted By: >>17279276 >>17279295

>>17279169
What makes you say that? The revenue of Samsung in 2009 was ~$117 billion. The combined revenue of Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo was ~$154 billion.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 34KiB, 200x200

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:41:00 No.17279269 Report

Quoted By: >>17279295 >>17279302

>>17279225
When will the hardware be available in a decently priced PC.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:42:00 No.17279276 Report

Quoted By: >>17279306

>>17279241

They don't have the marketing or the developer connections to make it work. Or the dedication to sink a HUGE sum of money into it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:43:00 No.17279295 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279241
Yes, they sell. But almost no profits.
>>17279269
The hardware is available you idiot. The emulator doesn't exist so hardware doesn't matter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:43:00 No.17279302 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279269
>decently priced

depends on how poor you are

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:43:00 No.17279306 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279276
:'(

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:44:00 No.17279308 Report

Quoted By: >>17279334

>>17279204
Dick sucking pro.

Two player, kinect style game, that monitors both people.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:47:00 No.17279334 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279308
The first DLC for that game would be Anal Expedition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:48:00 No.17279352 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279204
The ipad supports pretty decent games; the first game released on it was Dead Space 2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 03:57:00 No.17279426 Report

Quoted By: >>17279716 >>17279738

Sony will win the heart of all gamers with a $299 AMD powered console.

/thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 04:21:00 No.17279716 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279426
HA!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 04:23:00 No.17279738 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279426
HD6790 + Bulldozer + 2GB DDR3 + 1TB Internal HDD

MacFag !!9HixxlQIM2g

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 123KiB, 580x287

MacFag !!9HixxlQIM2g Tue 03 May 2011 04:28:00 No.17279796 Report

Quoted By: >>17279871

It doesn't matter, everyone will be playing games on their iPad 4 in 2013.

Oh, by the way. The iPad 4 will be released on 8 March 2013, at 5pm in retail stores in the US and twelve other countries. It costs $50 less than the iPad 3, comes with 128GB of NAND flash as standard, features a Retina+ Display (as people with 20/20 vision using binoculars can't distinguish individual pixels), six cameras (three on either side for 4D imaging, works with the iMobius Strip), and a 3.2GHz quad core ARM processor on an Apple A7 SOC.

Don't tell anyone!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 03 May 2011 04:35:00 No.17279871 Report

Quoted By:

>>17279796
i'd buy that

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches