>>5187897he did make it. and then he put his "gifmaker's watermark" on top of what he made, marring an otherwise good gif with desire for name recognition and brand protection, like almost every other tumblr gifmaker (
http://pr0ncave.tumblr.com/).
when you consider that michelangelo didn't sign the ceiling of the sistene chapel, putting your giant logo on a few seconds of someone else's porn seems ridiculous. i've made and posted a couple hundred gifs here, some of which get reposted quite a bit, and the idea of claiming them as "mine" with a watermark is something i'll never understand. gifs, like memes, should belong to the internet.