>>5432454I wonder how there could be any significant effect on quantity of a female's offspring, though.
They would find a man to impregnate them anyway.
Moreover, why would so many women look so ugly if their attractiveness was really shaping their looks?
I'm no evolution denier, but this particular bit doesn't make much sense to me unless men of earlier generations were much less horny than modern ones. Then again, why did evolution allow them to not be that horny in the first place?
Whole thing makes no sense.
I suppose big tits had some simple signalling role just as did a Pavian's red ass. This probably lost necessity with the rise of languages.
Nowadays, they're mostly energy deposits and fun (for men, not so much for women).