>>3008444>>3008579I believe the argument isn't that women never rape men, but in the meaning of 'reverse rape'. Rape is when an assailant sexually assaults a victim (or something along those lines). Now, the reverse of this is a victim sexually assaulting an assailant. It just doesn't make sense.
Ofcourse, if you assume men to be the only ones capable of rapists, then it does make sense. Rape: man sexually assaults a woman. Reverse rape: a woman sexually assaults a man.
Ironically, you're arguing that 'reverse rape' does exist because it's not impossible for men to be raped, but at the same time that definition leads the definition of rape to be performed solely by mean.
Like others, I think Soviet Russia works best (nice catch to it too), while light femdom is also acceptable. But I think femdom brings connotations of chains and whips and all that into mind, and so I prefer Soviet Russia.