If that critical pseudo-intellectual guy is still lurking, just know this, you obviously do not have nearly a broad enough knowledge of the culture here (few do) to actually understand everything about the OP. If you freak out over a soft plush I don't want to know how you'd react to being teleported to the middle of Akihabara. The thing is, having such a narrow cultural knowledge causes a much more narrow viewpoint, and with this tunnel-vision comes the tendency to try to rationalize things that you DO NOT understand... simplifying them to work with your own pathetically inadequate notions, is actually a perfectly apt way of describing the process. Basically it's grasping at straws, trying to make up premises that don't exist but that you wish did, so that you can try to spin your argument to sound like you're "winning". This isn't debate club, pulling shit out of your ass just to try to struggle to resist admitting that maybe, just maybe, you're possibly wrong about something... is still not going to change the facts at hand here. You're wrong. Sorry, asshole.
It's just a couple of silly photos with captions and nothing more. Yet, that one pseudo-intellectual guy seems to think he can read into it so much. I bet it's some college kid or recent grad who had a couple of psych/phil courses and now thinks that he can accurately understand the inner psyches of everyone around him. It's almost as if he thinks he knows more about us than we know about ourselves. Wait a second, that's a patent fallacy, see:
http://youarenotsosmart.com/2011/08/21/the-illusion-of-asymmetric-insight/