/k/ - Weapons » Thread #8769132

[83 / 20 / ?]

27KiB, 637x263, unknown.jpg

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:27:00 No.8769132 View View Reply Original Report

As a fellow gun owner, it truly saddens me that the days where I can keep my guns are numbered now in Canada.

Some of you may know that Canada is currently hosting a Federal Election, the only party that supports gun owners is the conservative party. If they win a majority, the Long-Gun Registry would be scrapped, if they win a minority, the opposition would form a coalition, leading to stricter gun ownership and gun confiscations.

In these desperate times, I ask for those on /k/ for help and advice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:29:00 No.8769137 Report

Quoted By:

assassinate jack layton

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 57KiB, 437x992

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:32:00 No.8769144 Report

Quoted By:

Both the Liberals and NDP are aiming for extreme gun control that would eventually lead to non-existent gun ownership.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:43:00 No.8769178 Report

Quoted By: >>8769183

Time to decide if you want health care or guns

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:44:00 No.8769183 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769178
well i am on /k/, so that explains it

DesertRat !!f1imH5CEV5c

DesertRat !!f1imH5CEV5c Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:44:00 No.8769184 Report

Quoted By: >>8769194

>>8769132

What's the immigration process for CA citizens to become US citizens? I mean the US is going in the same direction, but at a slightly slower/more delayed pace.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:48:00 No.8769194 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769184

see here in the US people flip out when gun bans are even talked about for a second. its a political nightmare to even speak of one while trying to get elected. thats the only thing we have going for us.

but as far as becoming a US citizen...near impossible. Just move here though. you dont need to be a citizen to buy weapons...

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:51:00 No.8769201 Report

Quoted By: >>8769228 >>8769229

we don't even have castle doctrine in canada, defending your home is a criminal offence if you use lethal force here.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 2MiB, 2448x1584

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:56:00 No.8769216 Report

Quoted By: >>8769225

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 341KiB, 1800x1077

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:57:00 No.8769218 Report

Quoted By:

our government wants to disarm us, there has to be other options to prevent this from happening, moving to the USA is just running away from the problem, not facing it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 16:58:00 No.8769222 Report

Quoted By: >>8769226

Guys.... so long as you share a border with the USA, any Canadian who really needs a firearm will be able to get one.

For better or worse.

DesertRat !!f1imH5CEV5c

DesertRat !!f1imH5CEV5c Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:00:00 No.8769225 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769216
I've seen this b4, and TBH, it immediatly made me drop my "those damned beaners should legally immigrate" feelings.

I now believe the immigration system needs a huge reform. I still do hate illegals that leech off us taxpayers. I have little issue giving social service benefits to a fellow tax payer, I know from experience, there are times where it's needed.

Sorry for getting off topic tho...

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:00:00 No.8769226 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769222

thats not the point, the point is they want to disarm law abiding responsible firearms owners, as proven time and time again, gun control do not work and this registry has done nothing to prevent crimes committed by unregistered guns.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 15KiB, 398x357

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:00:00 No.8769228 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769201

Thats why everybody up here says if you have to defend your home, you make sure that fucker never leaves your home alive.

Also, Im 99% sure you are allowed to use lethal force to defend yourself, ONLY if lethal force is being used against you. Equal force and all that. Id look it up before I go shooting an intruder if you plan on reporting it to the police and not just disposing of the corpse like any good Canadian should do.

Remember kids! An armed society is a democratic society!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:01:00 No.8769229 Report

Quoted By: >>8769236 >>8769242 >>8769252

>>8769201
Wrong. The Criminal Code states that you must use reasonable force to prevent the commission of an offence - so if the intruder is armed and you genuinely fear for your life, then you can use lethal force.

Lots of uneducated bullshit in this thread. The Long Gun registry is not a "gun grab" program, and it's not the massive money pit they like to talk about - if the Conservatives didn't continue to extend the amnesty period, the gun registry would actually turn a profit over the registration fees alone, profits which the RCMP have laid out a detailed plan that they would use to increase gun safety and awareness in the general public.

Get your fucking facts straight, you sheep. Christ.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:02:00 No.8769234 Report

Quoted By:

> What's the immigration process for CA citizens to become US citizens?

Marry an American.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:03:00 No.8769236 Report

Quoted By: >>8769243

>>8769229
What does it look like waaaay up there inside of your ass?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:07:00 No.8769242 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769229
How is the gun registry not a gun-grab program?

The confiscation of the T-97 non-restricted weapon that had it's status changed to prohibited by the RCMP is just a prime example. No monetary compensation is being offered to those owners who rightfully bough their weapons and are now asked to turn it in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:08:00 No.8769243 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769236
From Martin's Annual Criminal Code, 2011 Edition:

Section 27. "Use of Force to Prevent Commission of Offence"
27. Everyone is justified in using as much force as is reasonably necessary
(a) to prevent the commission of an offence
(i) for which, if if were committed, the person who committed it might be arrested without warrant, and
(ii) that would be likely to cause immediate and serious injury to the person or property of anyone; or
(b) to prevent anything being done that, on reasonable grounds, he believes would, if it were done, be an offence mentioned in paragraph (a). R.S., c. C-34, s. 27.

Do some fucking research.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:13:00 No.8769252 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769229
The registry itself is not a gun grab, and isn't really the issue. Both the liberals and NDP however both believe we need stricter gun laws here in Canada. They believe we should have things like local armories where we store weapons instead of in the home (Jack Layton specifically, has mentioned this), or that more weapons should be prohibited etc.

The registry is useless at any rate. I see no real way for it to "prevent crime". I mean, if I were a cop, I would not assume some drug dealer I'm about to bust doesn't have a gun just cause he didn't register one. I also won't assume that just because someone has registered one gun that it is the only one they own. So really, I can't see it telling a cop anything.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 67KiB, 464x600

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:16:00 No.8769261 Report

Quoted By: >>8769280 >>8770778

>true north strong and free
those words no longer have any meaning once they start confiscating and prohibiting rightfully bought and owned personal property.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:26:00 No.8769280 Report

Quoted By: >>8769289

>>8769261
Can you find me an actual article or citation concerning the "theft" of the T-97? Everywhere I've looked there's not even a blip about the gun being imported to Canada.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:26:00 No.8769284 Report

Quoted By:

assassinate your would-be leaders. that's WHY you have guns.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 76KiB, 627x497

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:31:00 No.8769289 Report

Quoted By: >>8769298

>>8769280
http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1203198

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:38:00 No.8769298 Report

Quoted By: >>8769305 >>8769330 >>8770701 >>8770742 >>8770770

>>8769289
Alright, interesting. But there's a big difference between some fudds complaining that they're rights have been infringed upon on a forum, and an actual press release or researched article in the media.

Obviously, it looks like someone screwed up and the firearms were mis-classified as restricted rather than prohibited for importation and sale.

Type 97 owners were instructed to either sell the now prohibited firearms to someone who was legally able to own it, or return the firearms to the dealer and obtain a refund, or turn them in for destruction.

That's still a ways off from "hurr durr they's takin' our gunz away!"

canadian

canadian Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:45:00 No.8769305 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769298
not really it starts with the small things then in 5 years semi auto is a prohibited weapon

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Apr 2011 18:04:00 No.8769330 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769298
Not really. If the government wants them so bad they should pay the receipt price. Otherwise, it's theft. Legal theft, but still theft.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 117KiB, 750x600

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:28:00 No.8770693 Report

Quoted By:

all the semi-automatic guns are already limited to 5 round magazines, all pistols are limited to 10 rounds.

now they want to ban all black rifles as well

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:30:00 No.8770701 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769298
>That's still a ways off from "hurr durr they's takin' our gunz away!"

It's the SAME THING.

Mildly Peturebed !MadfagPDOY

Mildly Peturebed !MadfagPDOY Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:38:00 No.8770719 Report

Quoted By:

LOLing at the dumbfucked canadian ITT who things any kind of registry is a good idea.

Tell me, how the fuck a registry would lower gun crime?

PLAYER HATER

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 41KiB, 275x384

PLAYER HATER Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:39:00 No.8770727 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:42:00 No.8770742 Report

Quoted By: >>8770795

>>8769298
Where the fuck have you been? This shit was huge, people had these things fucking preordered.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2010/05/17/guns-confiscation.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:45:00 No.8770757 Report

Quoted By: >>8770780 >>8770796

I'm in Windsor, ON right now, but I'm moving to the US at the end of the June. I'll vote Conservative before I leave.

OP I hope you know that the Conservatives don't give a fuck about the gun registry, they just want the extra votes. How many times have they been re-elected in the last decade, each time with the promise that, if re-relected, they would get rid of the registry?

They aren't going to do shit, but at least that's better than what the NDP and Liberals plan.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:48:00 No.8770769 Report

Quoted By: >>8770837

The gun registry will never be removed.

They have been promising this for the past ten years and nothing.

This is a major point for the conservative party and they know that they can easily trick voters every election by promising this.

The gun registry will never be banned because not even the people advocating it want it gone.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:49:00 No.8770770 Report

Quoted By: >>8770789

>>8769298

you mean telling people who had to do a shitload to own that gun that they can no longer own it isn't taking guns away?

Dude, taking away just one kind of gun is still taking guns away.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:50:00 No.8770778 Report

Quoted By:

>>8769261
> once they start confiscating and prohibiting rightfully bought and owned personal property
Pro-tip: Canadian citizens have no right to personal property. The constitution and Charter conveniently left that out. Legally the government doesn't have to compensate us for shit, they can take whatever they want.

The Type 97A fiasco is worse than what they did with the SPAS-12s. With the SPAS shotguns they started confiscating them a few weeks after they went on sale so only a few hundred people had them. With the Type 97As they let them be sold for a year or so. A few thousand Canadians were robbed of $800 worth of personal property without any compensation. That's fucked up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:50:00 No.8770780 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770757
They can't get rid of it because they're a fucking minority.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:53:00 No.8770789 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770770
Eh...I wouldn't say a "shitload". It isn't very hard to get a gun in Canada. You fill out a multiple-choice test, give the government about $200, get your license, then have guns and sent to your door.

Still it's fucked up. The RCMP has exactly ZERO oversight and doesn't have to answer to anybody. They can make up their own regulations and re-interpret existing regs whenever they want and nobody can do shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 47KiB, 720x369

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:54:00 No.8770795 Report

Quoted By: >>8770825

>>8770742
>In March, the RCMP sent letters to owners of the Norinco Type 97A rifles, demanding they turn in the guns. This came after the RCMP decided the gun was prohibited after determining it could be easily converted to fully automatic fire.

>"It was a purpose-built fully automatic firearm with the fully automatic features disabled by [Norinco] which were not reported to us," Cheliak said. "It is very easily converted back to automatic."

>Automatic weapons, even those converted to semi-automatic fire, are prohibited in Canada. Guns that can be easily converted to fully automatic fire are also prohibited.

wow. just...wow. i had no idea it was this bad. sounds like future crime to me.
BAN THIS GUN AS IT COULD POSSIBLY BE CONVERTED TO FULL AUTO AND SLAUGHTER THOUSANDS WITH HEAT SEEKING BULLETS

/k/aptain planet !!aELDeby/QBV

/k/aptain planet !!aELDeby/QBV Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:54:00 No.8770796 Report

Quoted By: >>8770825

>>8770757

they would've gotten rid of it if not for the dozen or so idiots that jumped ship out of fear of reprisal from their party.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 02:56:00 No.8770804 Report

Quoted By: >>8770820 >>8770835

The main issue is why the fuck would you have a gun registry when you already have licensing? It doesn't further restrict what kind of people can own weapons, just that you need to do more paper work. And supposed safety benefits for police are a myth. If you're a cop and you look up a home and it doesn't say there are any guns will you believe it? Illegal weapons exist, and the kinds of people that get there house raided aren't the kind of people that had a gun that was legal at any stage of ownership. It was bought illegally or stolen, most likely. So police will still act as if there is the threat of a firearm. Good job, the registry adds nothing.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 8KiB, 230x230

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:00:00 No.8770820 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770804
That's against my religion good sir, as a bureaucrat I believe firmly in the power of lists and documents. I have known from my many excursions that if a list says it is so, it is so, and if it says it is not so then by golly it is not so my good man!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:00:00 No.8770825 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770795
Wanna know how the RCMP determined that these could be "easily" converted? They took one to their lab and worked on for, I shit you not, six months. The used all the firearms experts, manufacturing assets they had and reverse engineered the fucker so it finally fired full auto.

This is apparently "easily converted". If the RCMP firearms centre can convert your firearm to full auto over the course of six months, then it can now be classed as illegal. That's a fucked up precedent.

>>8770796
Yep. A huge number of NDP and Liberals were on board with scrapping the registry. NDP and Liberal leaders thought they'd all be against it so they told them to vote however they wanted. When the NDP and Libs started voting FOR the scrap their leaders threatened them, and the next reading they all voted against it.

Fucked up system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:02:00 No.8770830 Report

Quoted By:

Canadian Handgun owners are a minority in Canada Im pretty sure there are less than 1 million handgun owners in Canada.
The way I see it is handgun will be all considered to be prohibited with in 10 years. Our handgun community is way too small and there are alot of misconception is in the general public about handguns. The liberals use hand gun as a platform.
Face its fellow canadian hand gun owners we will be unable to use them in a few years ;_;.
1 more liberal majority should be the end of it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 13KiB, 651x211

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:06:00 No.8770835 Report

Quoted By: >>8770847

>>8770804
yup no LE should trust the gun registry. I mean just look at the 3 rcmp officers kill in Alberta. The killer used an unregistered hk 33 ( i think )

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:06:00 No.8770837 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770769

Except last year in September it was almost removed. Harper is going to remove it if he gets majority not because he is pro-gun but that he understands it is such a waste of money.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:11:00 No.8770847 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770835
LEOs don't even USE the gun registry. That "LEOs access the registry 11,000 times a day" crap is misleading. When a cop runs your driver's license at a traffic stop it also scans the registry for your legally-owned firearms. THAT's what's counted.

Like it being said, police don't trust the registry. The people who will shoot at officers aren't the people who register their guns. If the RCMP is going to raid a home, and there are no guns registered there, it isn't like they'll just scrap the SWAT team and knock politely.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:15:00 No.8770858 Report

Quoted By: >>8770878

fight for what meager rights we have fellow Canadians.

Stockpile as many "SCARY" guns as you can.

Stockpile ammo

fuck the liberals

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:22:00 No.8770878 Report

Quoted By: >>8770899

>>8770858
>Stockpile as many "SCARY" guns as you can.
Why? There are no more provisions in the Firearms Act for grandfathering prohibited weapons. Any new prohibitions can only be met with door-to-door confiscation. Canadian shooters don't seem to understand that.

If (when) anything else is made illegal, it WILL be taken from you.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 39KiB, 640x511

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:23:00 No.8770880 Report

Quoted By: >>8770885 >>8771842

I just hope people dont go full retard and start banning firearms left and right
I mean this is Canada right, a country that is based on respecting each other no matter what cred race or religion.
I know I respect my fellow Canadian. I just hope they will respect my right to enjoy firearms. I dont want to hurt anyone i just love to shooting and the history that is associated with firearms.
Lets all just do what Canadians do best RESPECT other Canadians. And not be snotty little self righteous assholes that think they know best.

Goddam it I love this country ;_;

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:24:00 No.8770885 Report

Quoted By: >>8770893

>>8770880
Sry the terrible English 1st gen Chinese Canadian

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:26:00 No.8770893 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770885
It's mostly coherent.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 34KiB, 400x388

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:27:00 No.8770899 Report

Quoted By: >>8770920 >>8771020

>>8770878
>If (when) anything else is made illegal, it WILL be taken from you.
from my cold dead hands

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:35:00 No.8770920 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770899
>youwillnevershootattheRCMP.png

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:42:00 No.8770939 Report

Quoted By: >>8771090

I think this means that it's almost time for B.C. to leave Canada and join with Washington and Oregon to form the glorious republic of Cascadia. How about it, canadians?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:43:00 No.8770944 Report

Quoted By:

3 words
sks inna woods

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:52:00 No.8770980 Report

Quoted By:

>gun confiscation
yea i dont think they are gonna try that......

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 16KiB, 550x354

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:55:00 No.8770994 Report

Quoted By:

Bumping canadian firearm thread with cheap chinese firearms

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 7KiB, 480x88

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:56:00 No.8770999 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:59:00 No.8771016 Report

Quoted By: >>8771117 >>8771732

>Move to the US

>Lower taxes
>More guns
>Warmer
>Better TV

Unless you're black/muslim/hispanic

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 18KiB, 189x164

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 03:59:00 No.8771020 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770899
>yfw they actually come to your door

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:18:00 No.8771090 Report

Quoted By: >>8771142

>>8770939
We should also get Alberta with us as they have oil.

But seriously If they try and take my guns, I'm not giving them up without a fight.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:24:00 No.8771117 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771016
Enjoying dat Norinco?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:37:00 No.8771142 Report

Quoted By: >>8771160 >>8771165 >>8771746

>>8771090

Alberta has oil, but are they even remotely close in politics or culture? And I don't know bout B.C., but here in Washington we get more of our power from hydroelectric and natural gas anyways.

Do they even love guns as much as we do?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 47KiB, 581x448

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:38:00 No.8771145 Report

Quoted By:

>mfw my father is American and I have dual citizenship

Sucks to be you guys, going to move to Minnesota from Ontario sooner or later.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:41:00 No.8771160 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771142
Well they've always been conservative so I assume so.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 04:42:00 No.8771165 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771142
I also have dual citizenship fuck yar

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 06:46:00 No.8771732 Report

Quoted By: >>8771756

>>8771016

I am chinese, fuck

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 06:48:00 No.8771746 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771142

you'll be surprised, hunting and target shooting is huge in BC

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 06:49:00 No.8771756 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771732
>>8771732

Iknowhowyoufeelbro.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:01:00 No.8771842 Report

Quoted By:

>>8770880
>mfw i walk out of gunshop with a new purchase only to be boo'd by random strangers on the street

seriously wat. a lot of people have serious misconceptions with regards to gun owners, especially people in yuppie areas.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:11:00 No.8771898 Report

Quoted By: >>8771941 >>8772021

Everyone in this thread who is whining about the registry does realize that it's been Federal law to register your handguns since 1934 with your local law enforcement and the RCMP.

1934 people. That's Seventy-seven years.

I'd think that if they were "coming for our guns" they've had the opportunity and the means for a long goddamn time, yet they haven't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:17:00 No.8771941 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771898

The registry we want to get rid of is the long-gun registry, like everything in modern day society, getting rid of it is a small step towards the right direction for gun owners who shouldn't be prosecuted like criminals.

It's the little steps that count, the scrapping of the long-gun registry is one of these cornerstone steps.

First handguns, then long-guns. Thats how it works, right now they are trying to scare the public into voting for gun bans by using "assault rifles" that shoot .22LR to evoke emotions that these guns are dangerous.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 10KiB, 288x306

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:29:00 No.8772021 Report

Quoted By:

>>8771898

My handgun isn't registered.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 52KiB, 640x568

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:19:00 No.8772558 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:23:00 No.8772574 Report

Quoted By: >>8772686

Winnipeg here

I sure hope all the neech gangs and nig nog gangs here are registering their illegal handguns since my father who hunts deer has taken the the time to go through all that bullshit to register his

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:31:00 No.8772617 Report

Quoted By: >>8773136

>ITT: Delusional people who think Harper will ever get rid of the long gun registry

Sure is delusional in here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:39:00 No.8772662 Report

Quoted By: >>8772693 >>8772726

Jesus Christ you people are stupid if you believe a single word the conservatives say about guns, or economics, or anything, really. As I explained in another thread a week or two ago, the Conservatives know how to force stuff through a minority, they have done so many times, and if they actually gave a shit about the registry, it would be gone, but they don't give a shit except for the easy votes from gun owners by promising for the hundredth time to get rid of it. If anything the conservatives would be bad for gun owners by increasing minimum sentences for minor firearm offenses. Enjoy being sentenced like a gang hitman for transporting you handgun in a case not hard enough to break into.

I used to be a Conservative supporter, but they've had their chance and they fucked that chicken twice as hard as the Liberals ever did. The Liberals won't admit it, but they know the registry was a mistake and I don't expect them to touch gun laws for a good while, and the NDP have a lot of support in rural areas, so I doubt they'll do any of the shit you chucklefucks are saying they will.

tl;dr- If you're going to vote Conservative, don't do it over gun policy, none of the parties are actually going to follow up on any of the shit they're saying about it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:44:00 No.8772686 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772574
>all that bullshit to register his

>Calling a 1-800 number and giving them your license number and gun serial number is now a strenuous task

/k/aptain planet !!aELDeby/QBV

/k/aptain planet !!aELDeby/QBV Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:46:00 No.8772693 Report

Quoted By: >>8772737 >>8773136

>>8772662

harper would've gotten rid of the LGR with 391, if he had gotten the votes he should've gotten from opposition members that were for it, but those opposition members were threatened by their respective parties to vote against 391, hence the situation we are in now. if harper gets a majority, he can simply force the issue.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:52:00 No.8772726 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772662

This has been a major election issue for the past ten years and people still fall for it every time.

They can get other legislation through with a minority, but somehow this can't get through, even though it is a known fact that many liberals wanted to get rid of the registry too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:54:00 No.8772737 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772693
What part of, "the Conservatives know how to force stuff through a minority," don't you understand? If they wanted to get rid of the registry, it wouldn't have been a private member bill, it would have been attached to a budget bill back when the Liberals were really down in the polls, then if the Liberals didn't help pass the bill, it would force an election, and the Liberals would have lost big, so they'd bitch and moan and bargain, but at the end of the day, the registry would be gone by now, but it's still here, because the conservatives don't give a shit about gun owners other than milking us for easy votes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 11:00:00 No.8773136 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772693

See

>>8772617

>inb4 I know what I'm talking about I have the right to vote.

You also have the right to shut the fuck up and maybe you should use it just this once.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches