/k/ - Weapons » Thread #8772118

[22 / 4 / ?]

21KiB, 604x453, unknown.jpg

Von Moltke !!0AW2GLgsTD4 Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:46:00 No.8772118 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

8 F-22's vs. 100 A-10's, both can reach each others airfields and both airfields are defended by stingers and AAA.
(NOTE: 100 A-10's are cheaper than 8 F-22's)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:48:00 No.8772129 Report

Quoted By:

F-22's down all the A-10's in 5 mins.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:48:00 No.8772133 Report

Quoted By:

there arent enough missiles to shoot all the warthogs down. there arent enough missiles to shoot ONE warthog down.

Anonymous

FUCK YEA

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:49:00 No.8772135 Report

Quoted By:

'MURRICUH!!!

/K/im Jong Lulz

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 166KiB, 298x359

/K/im Jong Lulz Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:49:00 No.8772138 Report

Quoted By:

>mfw there is no use for jet fighters in dogfights if your enemy doesnt even have aircraft to dogfight with.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 62KiB, 640x480

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:50:00 No.8772140 Report

Quoted By:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II#Durability

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:50:00 No.8772142 Report

Quoted By:

nobody wanted to die, so they all flew around doing barrel rolls, landed and all got laid.

tl;dr everybody wins

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:50:00 No.8772145 Report

Quoted By:

motherfuckin depleted uranium all up in this bitch

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:52:00 No.8772151 Report

Quoted By:

Those F22s have to land sometime.

A10 is the victor

/K/im Jong Lulz

/K/im Jong Lulz Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:52:00 No.8772160 Report

Quoted By:

They all wonder why exactly they would be fighting each other if they're all in the same air force.

Draw.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 07:54:00 No.8772165 Report

Quoted By: >>8772189 >>8772219

The F-22 airfield is completely destroyed, the F-22's return to their airbase to die or crash. 30 A-10's survive, their airfield is damaged by SDBomblets but, most of the crew survives. The HOG's land on nearby roads or flat dirt. The greater loss of A-10 pilots is compensated for by the complete culling of F-22 groundcrews. The CEO of Lockheed Martin shits his pantsuit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:00:00 No.8772189 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772165
100 A-10's
>>$1180 million
>>80% mission readiness

8 F-22's
>>$1200 million
>>65% mission readiness

10 F-35's
>>$1200 million
>>70% mission readiness

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:01:00 No.8772193 Report

Quoted By:

This thread is as retarded as people who think modern battleships are a good idea.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:03:00 No.8772202 Report

Quoted By:

scrap F-35 program
A-10's rust away buy 2030.

buy 2000 Reapers, 150 Strike Eagles.
also B-52's will outlive B-1B's and the B-2A.

Human GPS 2.0 !!PAEbvZ2WqlK

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 24KiB, 700x511

Human GPS 2.0 !!PAEbvZ2WqlK Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:04:00 No.8772206 Report

Quoted By: >>8772247 >>8772249 >>8772268 >>8772276

I believe a really cool match up would be 15 MiG-25's against 15 English Electric Lightnings.

That would be awesome.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:07:00 No.8772219 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772165
dollar for dollar older, proven and robust weapons will defeat higher tech, unproven weapons everytime. EVERYTIME

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:13:00 No.8772243 Report

Quoted By:

The wing A-10s fly towards the flight of F-22s.

The A-10s are arranged in 5 rows 20 planes wide, about 500 yards apart from one another. The rows are about 200 yards vertically and staggered back 500 yards from each other.

Flying something like 10 degrees nose up, the entire wing simultaneously fires a 8 seconds GAU-8, creating a cloud containing 310 tons of armor piercing incendiary and high explosive incendiary rounds.

The flight of F-22s deploy flares to little effect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:14:00 No.8772247 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772206
>>implying the USSR could put up 15 Mig's at one time

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:14:00 No.8772249 Report

Quoted By: >>8772282

>>8772206

Rear aspect only IR guided Redtops against all aspect radar guided R-40? And only 2 missiles on Lightning vs 4 missiles on Foxbat?

That will not end well for Lightnings...

XTX-Imperator !!9ISOuk7efDT

XTX-Imperator !!9ISOuk7efDT Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:17:00 No.8772268 Report

Quoted By: >>8772282

>>8772206

Those Electric Lightnings would be shot down very fast.

The performance difference is staggering. The kinametic advantage would be a monopoly of the MiG's.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:19:00 No.8772276 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772206
the Foxbats go to fast into the turn and damage their engines, none make it back to base. The British all defect to the Soviets, but the soviets don't want their shitty planes. The Britfags are returned and all hung for treason.

Human GPS 2.0 !!PAEbvZ2WqlK

Human GPS 2.0 !!PAEbvZ2WqlK Sat 30 Apr 2011 08:20:00 No.8772282 Report

Quoted By:

>>8772268
>>8772249
Okay, the speed is matched in straight path travel but armament and turning is a different story. Let's try 5x 25's v. 15 Lightnings.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches