[21 / 4 / ?]
http://infos.fncv.com/public/pierrec/afghanistan-a10-thunderbolt-terroriste.wmv
Something I don't understand...
NATO and international community are obviously against Gadaffi, so why did we not attack massivly, with ground forces ? We help rebels ? Yeah. We send them supplies ? Yup. We make air strikes ? Affirmative. We send weapons to rebels ? Absolutly not, we are "peace keeper". WTF ? If we want Gadaffi to leave, we must attack him with all we have, until the destruction of his army, and then te rebels will take care of Libya.
Either we support the rebels and we do all we can to kill Gadaffi, or we absoluty don't care of dat country and we stop all our operations. Actually we "help-you-a-bit-but-we-don't-want-to-get-hands-dirty". C'mon, stop hypocrisy.
Something I don't understand...
NATO and international community are obviously against Gadaffi, so why did we not attack massivly, with ground forces ? We help rebels ? Yeah. We send them supplies ? Yup. We make air strikes ? Affirmative. We send weapons to rebels ? Absolutly not, we are "peace keeper". WTF ? If we want Gadaffi to leave, we must attack him with all we have, until the destruction of his army, and then te rebels will take care of Libya.
Either we support the rebels and we do all we can to kill Gadaffi, or we absoluty don't care of dat country and we stop all our operations. Actually we "help-you-a-bit-but-we-don't-want-to-get-hands-dirty". C'mon, stop hypocrisy.
