/k/ - Weapons » Thread #8782452

[23 / 3 / ?]

46KiB, 480x400, unknown.jpg

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 03:55:00 No.8782452 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>8782463 >>8782474 >>8782501

Is anyone else angry the U.S. signed those treaties saying we wouldn't weaponize or claim parts of space? Imagine what it would be like to have complete control of space.

Dunecoon !!agrb2CyR7tQ

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 27KiB, 430x242

Dunecoon !!agrb2CyR7tQ Mon 02 May 2011 03:58:00 No.8782463 Report

Quoted By: >>8782589

>>8782452
SALT II? It was an international treaty.

No, we still have kinetic bombardment.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 03:59:00 No.8782467 Report

Quoted By:

*cues star wars march song*

Donkeydick Glittertits !3CDajQ7X9k

Donkeydick Glittertits !3CDajQ7X9k Mon 02 May 2011 04:00:00 No.8782474 Report

Quoted By: >>8782484

>>8782452
>Implying we DONT have complete control of space

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:03:00 No.8782484 Report

Quoted By: >>8782504

>>8782474
to be fair china is actually ramping up there space shit. but yea

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:05:00 No.8782501 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782452
>thinks people actually follow these treaties

Donkeydick Glittertits !3CDajQ7X9k

Donkeydick Glittertits !3CDajQ7X9k Mon 02 May 2011 04:06:00 No.8782504 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782484
let them ramp. NASA's already established and manages to work miracles with a shoestring budget. If America got pissed we'd just syphon more money to them and be done with it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:10:00 No.8782524 Report

Quoted By: >>8782554

>OH NO WE CAN'T BE THE EVIL EMPIRE
>THIS MAKES ME MAD

Stop being stereotypical

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:14:00 No.8782534 Report

Quoted By: >>8782547 >>8782558

Weaponizing space is retarded when it costs $20,000 per pound of anything you want to put up there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:18:00 No.8782547 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782534
True. We should really be putting more development into Space Elevators.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:19:00 No.8782554 Report

Quoted By: >>8782627 >>8782664

>>8782524
What? Their is nothing wrong with wanting your country to have the most power.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:21:00 No.8782558 Report

Quoted By: >>8782615

>>8782534
That price is only going to go down, it probably used to cost 4 years worth of your salary to fly in one of them new fangled flying machines.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:29:00 No.8782589 Report

Quoted By: >>8782619

>>8782463
I was wondering how long one of those would take to hit a target.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:35:00 No.8782615 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782558
so like 20 bucks? neat

Dunecoon !!agrb2CyR7tQ

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 246KiB, 800x594

Dunecoon !!agrb2CyR7tQ Mon 02 May 2011 04:37:00 No.8782619 Report

Quoted By: >>8782641

>>8782589
Google says about 2 hours for an ultra high satellite.

Remember these things travel at around Mach 10.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:40:00 No.8782627 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782554
>Their
>He thinks nationality means anything
0/10 laughinggirls.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:42:00 No.8782641 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782619
Wow, thats terrifying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 04:48:00 No.8782664 Report

Quoted By: >>8782737 >>8782748

>>8782554
Did you complain when the world agreed to not take resources or develop on Antarctica?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 05:06:00 No.8782737 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782664
Yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 05:08:00 No.8782748 Report

Quoted By: >>8782805

>>8782664
>antarctica
>resources
wut.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 05:16:00 No.8782791 Report

Quoted By:

the problem with weaponizing space is that people are gonna want to defend against them. Remember when china blew up a satellite to prove they could? What that did was make a shitton of small, 5.7mm pieces of shrapnel that are also in orbit and won't de-orbit by themselves until they damn well want to. The more weapons in space, the more is gonna get blown up, whos pieces are gonna shred other satellites, which will make a cloud of sharp pointy fast metal bits that will prevent any satellites from being safely launched up, military or otherwise. THAT's why we don't want space weaponized, even though rods from god would be totally badass.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 05:18:00 No.8782805 Report

Quoted By:

>>8782748
You know there's solid land under that ice right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 02 May 2011 05:21:00 No.8782821 Report

Quoted By:

What we need to do is develop space ships designed to for resource collecting (everything from floating junk to mining on low gravity planets, refining raw materials, and factories, respectively.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches