Earlier this year, as part of the tools of war series, At War published photographs of Taliban small arms from Helmand province, along with data on the types of firearms in insurgent use. The photographs included images of bolt-action rifles, including one, a Lee-Enfield rifle, that dated to 1915.
http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/whats-inside-a-taliban-gun-locker/ In spite of their advanced age, Lee-Enfield rifles, along with Soviet Mosin-Nagant bolt-action arms, have seen continued service in Afghanistan for two reasons: they offer greater range and accuracy than the assault rifles in more common circulation, and their ammunition remains available on Afghan black markets.
Many readers wrote with questions about that old Lee-Enfield. Some asked what else we might be seeing. Today we return to the collection with the publication of an even older rifle seized from the Taliban.
tan for two reasons: they offer greater range and accuracy than the assault rifles in more common circulation, and their ammunition remains available on Afghan black markets.
Many readers wrote with questions about that old Lee-Enfield. Some asked what else we might be seeing. Today we return to the collection with the publication of an even older rifle seized from the Taliban.
The rifle in question, also collected by Marines in Marja, is a standard-issue Martini-Henry rifle. The Martini-Henry predates the Lee-Enfield by a more than generation. It was first fielded in the 1870s and was carried by British colonial troops to far-flung corners of the world. Like the Lee-Enfield line, and like well-made infantry rifles generally, the Martini-Henry rifles proved sturdy and have lasted, when well-cared for, for more than a century.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Now take a good look at this particular Martini-Henry rifle, as there is a clear difference between it and the Lee-Enfield that was collected in roughly the same area. The difference is in its condition. The Lee-Enfield, and many others picked up by the Marines, were reasonably maintained and in working order. The Martini-Henry was not. Why the difference? While the former owner of the Martini-Henry was not available for an interview, one plausible explanation would point not to the rifle, but to the ammunition it fires. The Marines have often collected from caches the old .303 ammunition for Lee-Enfield rifles, which was in extensive manufacture through World War Two and beyond. The Martini-Henry rifle shown here fires an older cartridge, the .450/577. And in an email, Richard Jones, the British small arms expert and editor of Jane’s Infantry Arms, noted that this ammunition has been “out of serious production for nigh on 100 years.”
Oswald
Quoted By:
A rifle without ammunition is no better than a club. And without ready sources of supply, a weapon like this has become, for practical purposes, obsolete.
In a land where even Kalashnikovs with rusty exteriors are often oiled inside and kept in working order, a Martini-Henry, it seems, is a tool fit for a bygone time, and allowed to fall into neglect. This rifle was a mess inside and out. British .303 ammunition, while not apparently abundant, still does turn up in the field. The supplies are much smaller than in decades past, but they are not yet exhausted.
These rifles, both of them antiques, offer a lesson. Rifles and ammunition are a system, and when nations fielded them they manufactured and distributed them together. Decades on, the martial refuse of many nations litter the developing world, providing a means in volatile lands for war, terror and crime. How long does it take a class of rifles to die? In some cases, the answer might be this: When the ammunition source runs dry.
For more information on this particular rifle, the Martini-Henry line, and antique fighting tools in Afghanistan, go here.
http://cjchivers.com/post/2164511162/in-afghanistan-artifacts-from-wars-gone-by Anonymous
Quoted By:
So what you're telling me is that I shouldn't field a Martini-Henry as my main combat weapon? Fuck, you drive a hard bargain OP.
Oswald
Quoted By:
In a previous post, and an article last year, The New York Times examined the question of how Taliban fighters obtain their small-arms ammunition. The limited data available – gleaned from captured Taliban weapons and magazines, or from spent casings collected from Taliban firing positions after firefights – pointed to Afghan security forces as a significant source. A newly captured PK machine gun, seized on Feb. 18 by the Marines of Kilo Company, Third Battalion, Sixth Marines, further supports this view.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The weapon was picked up by the company’s First Platoon after a firefight of several hours, during which the Marines and Taliban fighters fired at each other across agricultural fields, ditches and irrigation canals. Both sides were bounding between small mud-walled compounds. After Taliban fighters were contained in a compound, a Reaper drone fired a Hellfire guided missile into its northern wall. The Marines entered the grounds and found the mangled remains of an Afghan man wrapped around a machine gun, which had been heavily damaged by shrapnel and the blast. They carried the weapon and its ammunition back to the company outpost. A quick inventory of the ammunition, before the weapon was passed on to the battalion intelligence section, showed markings identical to ammunition purchased by the Pentagon and provided to Afghan security forces. These included rounds with the distinctive headstamp of the WOLF Ammunition Company, an American firm that under Pentagon contract has provided Russian-made small-arms ammunition for Afghan police officers and troops. They also included rounds bearing the headstamp 188, the marking of the Novosibirsk Cartridge Plant in Russia. The United States has recently been providing Afghan forces with PK machine-gun ammunition manufactured in this plant.
Oswald
Quoted By:
(Interestingly, Kilo Company received a shipment of PK machine-gun ammunition bearing the factory stamp 188 the day after this particular firefight. The ammunition was for issue to the Afghan National Army platoon that is accompanying the Marine company on the Marja offensive.) In all, the Marines collected four belts of PK ammunition with the weapon. The first belt had 23 rounds – 22 bearing WOLF markings and one with the 188 stamp. The second belt has 52 rounds – 39 from WOLF and 13 bearing the 188 mark. The third belt had 93 rounds – 28 WOLF and 65 showing 188. The last belt remained in the ammunition drum, which was still attached to the weapon. Almost all of its the roughly 100 visible rounds were marked with 188, although perhaps 10 strays had other markings. A full count was not possible; the battalion command group arrived as the rounds were being inventoried, and the weapon was passed on. Nonetheless, the available data was clear. The preponderance of the ammunition the Taliban used in this weapon, which was fired on American troops and found very near a site from which the Taliban has ambushed American patrols, including an ambush that killed a Marine last week, was identical to the ammunition the United States has provided its Afghan charges.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The presence in Taliban arms of ammunition identical to that provided by the Pentagon to Afghan forces could be explained by many means of diversion. Capture on the battlefield, corruption and theft all likely play roles. Many American officers who have worked with Afghan units put corruption at the top of the list; a sizable fraction of Afghan troops and police officers, they say, sell issued equipment, fuel and ammunition to bazaars. The PK machine gun is a member of the Kalashnikov family of small arms. It was fielded by the Soviet military in the early 1960s and became the standard medium machine gun for the Soviet Army and Warsaw Pact forces. Like the Kalashnikov assault rifle and its many descendants and clones, the PK and its offspring have spread across the much of the undeveloped world, particularly in Asia and Africa, where it is highly regarded for its reliability, and feared for its range and lethality. Its resemblance to the assault rifle is otherwise faint. It is a true, belt-fed machine gun, and it fires a faster, heavier round than the medium-powered cartridge fired by the Kalashnikov assault-rifle line. That cartridge — a traditional high-powered 7.62×54-millimeter round — is one of the standard small-arms rounds put into wide circulation by the military forces of the former Eastern bloc. The ammunition also fits the SVD sniper rifle series, making the ammunition especially dangerous for American forces on the battlefield. Time and again, when the ammunition in Taliban small arms is examined, some of it shows signs of having originated in Afghanistan in government hands. The Pentagon, it seems, is indirectly arming the Afghan forces it fights – underscoring once more the difficulties of waging counterinsurgency war in support of a government undermined by corruption and other ills.
Oswald
What’s Inside a Taliban Gun Locker? Oswald Wed 25 May 2011 14:50:00 No. 8932020 Report Quoted By:
The New York Times and At War have taken several different looks at insurgent arms and munitions in Afghanistan, which can yield information about how insurgents equip themselves and fight, and how the Taliban has been able to maintain itself as a viable force for more than 15 years. Today the blog will turn back to this pursuit with another sampling of data from Marja, the area in Helmand Province that has seen some of the most sustained insurgent fighting of 2010. In this case, early this summer, the civilian law enforcement liaison working with the Marines of Third Battalion, Sixth Marines, along with the battalion’s gunner, had in their custody 26 firearms and an RPG-7 launcher captured from Taliban fighters or collected from caches. Of these weapons, 12 were variants of the Kalashnikov assault rifle, 8 were bolt-action rifles from World War II or earlier, 4 were variants of the PK machine gun, and 2 were small semiautomatic pistols. This was in some ways a typical mix for Afghanistan, although the ratio of bolt-action rifles was higher than what many units outside of Helmand Province have seen.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The ratio is interesting and aligns with the experience of patrolling in and near Marja and other contested areas nearby. Insurgents in Helmand Province seem to have used bolt-action rifles more than in many regions of Afghanistan. Whether this indicates a pressure on the supply of assault rifles and their ammunition or a preference for the longer effective ranges of Lee-Enfield and Mosin-Nagant rifles is not clear. But the longer range of bolt-action rifles compared with assault rifles, and their relative abundance in Helmand Province, is a reason this particular acreage of Afghanistan has a reputation as being plagued by a more dangerous set of Afghan marksmen, and even a few snipers, as seen in this video. For those who have been under fire in Helmand, finding that a large fraction of captured rifles are Lee-Enfields or Mosin-Nagants is not surprising. This battalion’s battlefield collections fit its Marines’ experiences on patrol. Moving past these ratios, the characteristics of individual weapons also provided clues to the Taliban’s behavior and state of equipment and supply, and to the nature of the infantry arms loose in the Afghan countryside.
Oswald
Quoted By:
As was typical of many older PK-variant machine guns, the stock was made of laminated wood — plywood, essentially. And some time ago it had been snapped. But whoever was responsible for it had cobbled it back in place with the help of two strips of sheet metal and a handful of light nails. There was still play in the stock, and this would undermine its accuracy. But the weapon could be used. Does this say something of the insurgents’ resourcefulness? Or of the insurgency’s limited means? Maybe both. Now look at this assault rifle, below, an original AK-47 with a solid steel receiver. Its date and factory stampings reveal that it had been manufactured in 1954 in the Soviet Union’s main Kalashnikov plant at the mammoth gunworks at Izhevsk. Look at it closely. Its exterior is heavily pitted and corroded. I disassembled this rifle, and inside, where it most counts, its operating system — the integrated gas piston and bolt carrier, the trigger assembly, etc. — had been oiled and were only lightly pitted. Someone had been tending to its guts, if not its skin. In Marja, which is a populated patch of steppe astride a huge irrigation works built decades ago by the United States, the Marines sometimes find weapons hidden in canals. This weapon could have been submerged for some time before being retrieved for use, and considering what it seems to have been through, that 1954 manufacturing stamp impresses. The weapon, a rifle that came off assembly lines a year after Stalin died, was fully functional at age 56 and was still in service this year in war against the West.
Dunecoon !!agrb2CyR7tQ
Oswald
Quoted By:
How do Taliban fighters operate and sustain themselves as an effective force in the field? An article today provides a set of insights about Taliban tactics in Helmand Province, gleaned from a mix of patrols last month and interviews with dozens of Marines on the ground. No one story, of course, can provide a full answer to questions of how a complex insurgent force organizes to protect itself and to fight. But bit by bit a fuller understanding can be assembled. We will now use this blog to glimpse at the Taliban through another lens, provided by a piece of recently captured equipment. The equipment in question was a 30-round magazine used in an insurgent’s Kalashnikov assault rifle. The magazine, slightly less than half-full, was collected by Bravo Company, First Battalion, Third Marines after a firefight with Taliban fighters in January. At least one insurgent was killed that day when Cobra helicopter gunships caught a group of fighters fleeing in the open, according to Marines who participated in the fight. The Taliban’s foot soldiers have been adept over the years at carrying off their wounded, their dead and their equipment. But in this case they missed at least one corpse and lost some of their gear. The Marines carried the confiscated equipment back to an outpost. An officer then allowed the magazine’s contents to be inventoried by The New York Times.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Last year, The Times examined the contents of 30 Kalashnikov magazines taken from insurgents killed in an American ambush in Korangal Valley, and found telling signs of diversion of ammunition from the Afghan army or police. At least 17 of the magazines contained ammunition identical to the cartridges issued by the United States to Afghan government forces. Because there are literally thousands of potential sources of Kalashnikov ammunition, differentiated by markings that show their factory and year of manufacture, the precise match to ammunition carried by Afghan government units strongly implied that the United States was indirectly arming the Taliban. In the months since, several private contractors and American military officers who have trained and mentored Afghan forces have described for me — sometimes in person, sometimes by e-mail — how Afghan police officers and soldiers have sold ammunition, fuel and other materials provided to them by the United States. One phenomenon is known as converting government property to “chai money,” the practice of selling a portion of issued fuel, uniforms, sleeping bags and ammunition in bazaars in order to augment pay. Once ammunition makes its way to a bazaar, it’s a small step from reaching insurgent hands.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The possibility that the Taliban obtain a significant portion of their small-arms ammunition, directly or indirectly, from the Afghan government is not in itself a surprise. Insurgents the world over have often relied on government leakage to arm their ranks. The practice is so common that it was a guerrilla axiom popularized by Mao, who wrote in his durable 1937 treatise, “On Guerrilla Warfare,” that guerrillas should regard their enemy as their source of supply. Worries over Afghan ammunition leakage are one reason the United States is issuing M-16s to Afghan forces to replace the many tens of thousands of Kalashnikov assault rifles that it had previously distributed here. For years, Afghan troops and the Taliban have carried the same style and caliber rifles, almost all from the Kalashnikov line. Once the transition to M-16s is complete, though, Afghan troops will be issued ammunition (5.56-millimeter N.A.T.O. standard instead of 7.62×39-millimeter former Eastern Bloc ammunition) that is not compatible with the Taliban’s primary arms. This should take away some of the incentive for Afghan troops to sell their ammunition, and also make it harder for insurgents to rely on Afghan government sources — gained either via corruption or battlefield capture — to help arm their fighters
Oswald
Quoted By:
So what did this latest captured rifle magazine contain? And what might it tell us? In all, the magazine held 14 rounds of Kalashnikov ammunition, almost all of which were in visibly poor condition — dented, pitted, soiled, weathered and scuffed. Most of the ammunition could be traced back to its point of manufacture. (This is done by examining the markings, known as headstamps, on the base of each cartridge and comparing them with keys published over the years by Western intelligence agencies. The headstamps typically contain a coded manufacturer’s mark and production year.) Of the 14 rounds, 13 had visible headstamps. One was blank. No two rounds were matched by manufacturer or by year. This disparate little batch suggested an interesting story. More on that in a moment. First, the breakdown. Of the 13 marked rounds, three had been manufactured in what was the People’s Republic of Hungary during the cold war. Five were manufactured during the same period in the former Yugoslavia. These include three rounds from the Igman Ammunition Plant in what is now Konjic, Bosnia and two that appear to have been manufactured at the Prvi Partizan Plant in what is now Serbia. One appeared to have been manufactured in post-Soviet Russia. Most of the ammunition was manufactured in the 1970s or 1980s, although one round, the Russian, was dated 2002.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The remaining five rounds included three with different Arabic headstamps and one not covered by the many keys I have gathered from ordnance sources over the years. (I’ve sent pictures of these to a nongovernment expert who might be able to identify them later.) What might this data mean? On one level, some of these newly obtained rounds hinted at diversion, because the three Hungarian rounds were identical to some of the ammunition that the United States has issued in Afghanistan. But with this particular magazine, it was not the whiff of diversion that made the sample compelling. It was the diversity. The fact that every round was different from the others suggests that whoever supplied this fighter did not have a robust and uniform source of supply. The ammunition had been cobbled together from multiple sources. While this might be taken to hint at Taliban resourcefulness, it might also be read to indicate that the Taliban in Helmand Province have difficulty securing assault-rifle ammunition in large quantities, or obtaining well-maintained and packaged ammunition. Assault-rifle ammunition is, of course, an essential ingredient for guerrilla fighting in Afghanistan. It is also typically needed in bulk, in part because many people who carry Kalashnikovs often fire on the fully automatic mode and burn through ammunition at blazing rates.
Oswald
Quoted By:
A word of caution is in order. It is difficult to extrapolate with certitude from one half-expended magazine. Even larger samples might reflect only local conditions or the peculiar logistics of a particular fighting unit. And other variables could be at play. The fighter who carried this magazine might have been a low-level or part-time insurgent. Supplying him might not have been a Taliban priority. New and more uniform caches of ammunition might be stockpiled in places of high Taliban interest, like the purported insurgent and drug-baron haven in Marja. But from the perspective of a counterinsurgent, the sampling in the Korangal Valley last year was more alarming. Several of those magazines contained nearly uniform cartridges that were in good condition — as if those insurgents had recently obtained cartons of ammunition from government sources. Whatever the limits of extrapolation from this magazine, this much is clear. No serious gunfighter, given the choice, would want to fill his assault-rifle magazines with mismatched, dated and dented ammunition, manufactured to different specifications in different places in different years. In a future post about Taliban marksmanship, or, rather, the frequent lack of it, I’ll discuss why. For now the contents of this magazine raise an interesting question: Seven months after the Marines set out to clear Helmand Province, are Taliban fighters having difficulties acquiring one of war’s most basic fuels?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Post faster dammit
Oswald
Oh where, oh where has my Afghan gun gone? Oswald Wed 25 May 2011 15:11:00 No. 8932086 Report Quoted By:
As part of international efforts to train and equip the Afghan National Army and the Afghan National Police, collectively referred to as the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF), the U.S. has been responsible for procuring and distributing about 380,000 small arms and light weapons. These include grenade launchers, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, mortars, pistols, rifles, and shotguns. The Department of Defense and 21 donor nations report the value of these weapons at over $223 million. Given the unstable security conditions in Afghanistan, lapses in accounting for these weapons is significant.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Enter the United States Government Accountability Office and a new report that reveals sloppy inventory records for an estimated 87,000 weapons—or about 36 percent—of the 242,000 weapons that the United States procured and shipped to Afghanistan from December 2004 through June 2008. Serial numbers were not recorded for about 46,000 of these weapons, and for an estimated 41,000 weapons with recorded serial numbers, no records were maintained of their location or disposition. Furthermore, no reliable records were maintained for any of the weapons obtained from international donors from June 2002 through June 2008, which totaled about 135,000 weapons.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Lapses in accountability occurred throughout the supply chain. For example, during the transportation of U.S.-procured weapons into Afghanistan, no serial numbers were provided to verify receipt. Additionally, after receiving weapons in Kabul, no record was made of their serial numbers nor were routine physical inventories conducted at the central depots where the weapons were stored. Also, monitoring the end use of sensitive night vision devices was not begun until about 15 months after issuing them to Afghan National Army units. The GAO's conclusion? Units in Afghanistan cannot fully safeguard and account for weapons and weapons provided to ANSF are at serious risk of theft or loss. Now that just doesn't add up! This is much more serious than a coat room attendant misplacing one's purse (with gun.) Losing track of this amount of firepower is closer to aiding the enemy in misplacing the coat attendant! Pitiful.
N.Ire.Shooter !kE82Nj6JyE
Anyone really interested in this should look to buy "The Gun" by C.J.Chivers
http://cjchivers.com/ It's not a book for those only vaguely interesting in small arms, but encompasses the political, military, socio-economics and much much surrounding small arms production and proliferation the world over
Oswald
Arms Sent by U.S. May Be Falling Into Taliban Hands Oswald Wed 25 May 2011 15:16:00 No. 8932098 Report Quoted By:
KABUL — Insurgents in Afghanistan, fighting from some of the poorest and most remote regions on earth, have managed for years to maintain an intensive guerrilla war against materially superior American and Afghan forces. Arms and ordnance collected from dead insurgents hint at one possible reason: Of 30 rifle magazines recently taken from insurgents’ corpses, at least 17 contained cartridges, or rounds, identical to ammunition the United States had provided to Afghan government forces, according to an examination of ammunition markings by The New York Times and interviews with American officers and arms dealers. The presence of this ammunition among the dead in the Korangal Valley, an area of often fierce fighting near Afghanistan’s border with Pakistan, strongly suggests that munitions procured by the Pentagon have leaked from Afghan forces for use against American troops.
Oswald
Quoted By:
The scope of that diversion remains unknown, and the 30 magazines represented a single sampling of fewer than 1,000 cartridges. But military officials, arms analysts and dealers say it points to a worrisome possibility: With only spotty American and Afghan controls on the vast inventory of weapons and ammunition sent into Afghanistan during an eight-year conflict, poor discipline and outright corruption among Afghan forces may have helped insurgents stay supplied. The United States has been criticized, as recently as February by the federal Government Accountability Office, for failing to account for thousands of rifles issued to Afghan security forces. Some of these weapons have been documented in insurgents’ hands, including weapons in a battle last year in which nine Americans died. In response, the Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, the American-led unit tasked with training and supplying Afghan forces, said it had made accountability of all Afghan police and military property a top priority, and taken steps to locate and log rifles issued even years ago. The Pentagon has created a database of small arms issued to Afghan units.
Oswald
Quoted By:
No similarly thorough accountability system exists for ammunition, which is harder to trace and more liquid than firearms, readily changing hands through corruption, illegal sales, theft, battlefield loss and other forms of diversion. American forces do not examine all captured arms and munitions to trace how insurgents obtained them, or to determine whether the Afghan government, directly or indirectly, is a significant Taliban supplier, military officers said. The reasons include limited resources and institutional memory of issued arms, as well as an absence of collaboration between field units that collect equipment and the investigators and supervisors in Kabul who could trace it. In this case, the rifle magazines were captured last month by a platoon in Company B, First Battalion, 26th Infantry, which killed at least 13 insurgents in a nighttime ambush in eastern Afghanistan. The soldiers searched the insurgents’ remains and collected 10 rifles, a rocket-propelled-grenade launcher, 30 magazines and other equipment.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Access to Taliban equipment is unusual. But after the ambush, the company allowed the items to be examined by this reporter. Photographs were taken of the weapons’ serial numbers and markings on the bottoms of the cartridge casings, known as headstamps, which can reveal where and when ammunition was manufactured. The headstamps were then compared with ammunition in government circulation, and with this reporter’s records of ammunition sampled in Afghan magazines and bunkers in multiple provinces in recent years. The type of ammunition in question, 7.62x39 millimeter, colloquially known as “7.62 short,” is one of the world’s most abundant classes of military small-arms cartridges, and can come from dozens of potential suppliers. It is used in Kalashnikov rifles and their knockoffs, and has been made in many countries, including Russia, China, Ukraine, North Korea, Cuba, India, Pakistan, the United States, the former Warsaw Pact nations and several countries in Africa. Several countries have multiple factories, each associated with distinct markings. The examination of the Taliban’s cartridges found telling signs of diversion: 17 of the magazines contained ammunition bearing either of two stamps: the word “WOLF” in uppercase letters, or the lowercase arrangement “bxn.”
Oswald
Quoted By:
“WOLF” stamps mark ammunition from Wolf Performance Ammunition, a company in California that sells Russian-made cartridges to American gun owners. The company has also provided cartridges for Afghan soldiers and police officers, typically through middlemen. Its munitions can be found in Afghan government bunkers. The “bxn” marking was formerly used at a Czech factory during the cold war. Since 2004, the Czech government has donated surplus ammunition and equipment to Afghanistan. A.E.Y. Inc., a former Pentagon supplier, also shipped surplus Czech ammunition to Afghanistan, according to the United States Army, including cartridges bearing “bxn” stamps. Most of the Wolf and Czech ammunition in the Taliban magazines was in good condition and showed little weathering, denting, corrosion or soiling, suggesting it had been removed from packaging recently.
Oswald
Quoted By:
There is no evidence that Wolf, the Czech government or A.E.Y. knowingly shipped ammunition to Afghan insurgents. A.E.Y. was banned last year from doing business with the Pentagon, but its legal troubles stemmed from unrelated allegations of fraud. Given the number of potential sources, the probability that the Taliban and the Pentagon were sharing identical supply sources was small. Rather, the concentration of Taliban ammunition identical in markings and condition to that used by Afghan units indicated that the munitions had most likely slipped from state custody, said James Bevan, a researcher specializing in ammunition for the Small Arms Survey, an independent research group in Geneva.
Anonymous
This is a fascinating in-depth series of articles. Is this from FOX news?
Oswald
U.S. Worried Iran Sending Chinese Weapons To Taliban via Pakistan Oswald Wed 25 May 2011 15:27:00 No. 8932129 Report Quoted By:
Authorities in Herat found a 10-ton cache of weapons marked with Chinese, Russian, and Persian (Pajhwak Afghan News) U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte says Washington has complained to Beijing about Chinese weapons shipments to Iran that appear to be turning up in the hands of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. Negroponte confirmed the U.S. concerns over China's weapons deals with Tehran after a 10-ton weapons cache was discovered in the western Afghan province of Herat. The cache found in Ghurian district, near the border with Iran, included artillery shells, land mines, and rocket-propelled grenade launchers with Chinese, Russian, and Persian markings on them. Britain's Foreign Office has also confirmed that it has complained to Beijing about Chinese-made HN-5 antiaircraft missiles confiscated from Taliban fighters who were captured or killed by British Royal Marines in Helmand Province. Beijing has said that it would investigate allegations that the weapons were forwarded to the Taliban through Iran. When asked in Kabul on September 11 about the Taliban's use of sophisticated new Chinese weapons, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte also suggested that Iran has been a transit point for Chinese arms deliveries to the Taliban.
Oswald
NYT, Armytimes, rferl.org, telegraph, dod, wired Oswald Wed 25 May 2011 15:32:00 No. 8932144 Report Quoted By:
"A subject that I have discussed with the Chinese in the past is the fact of their weapons sales to the country of Iran and our concern," Negroponte said. "We have tried to discourage the Chinese from signing any new weapons contracts with Iran. We are concerned by reports -- which we consider to be reliable -- of explosively formed projectiles and other kinds of military equipment coming from Iran across the border and coming into the hands of the Taliban." In June, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said Washington had no evidence proving a direct role by the Iranian government in smuggling weapons to the Taliban. But Gates said Washington suspects Tehran is involved. "I haven't seen any intelligence specifically to this effect, but I would say, given the quantities we are seeing, it is difficult to believe that it is associated with smuggling or the drug business or that it is taking place without the knowledge of the Iranian government," Gates said. Not Without Tehran's Knowledge? Alex Vatanka is the Washington-based Iran analyst for Jane's Information Group, which publishes "Jane's Defence Weekly" and other journals about the weapons industry and global security issues. Vatanka says it will remain unclear whether the Ghurian weapons cache is linked to the Taliban until Afghan or U.S. authorities announce details of their joint investigation.
Oswald
Quoted By:
But the presence of Chinese weapons so close to the Iranian border is the strongest evidence to date suggesting Tehran has had at least an indirect role in arms shipments to Afghanistan. "Whether the government or somebody in Iran could be buying arms from China and, without Tehran's knowledge, ship it over to Afghanistan -- on that volume of weapons -- I find that extremely unlikely," Vatanka says. "I can only see that happening if somebody pretty senior and in an influential political position in Iran decided to facilitate that without letting everybody in the system know about it," he continues. "But they still had to be involved somewhere in the state machinery. We're not talking about rogue elements [in Iran]. Baluchi drug traffickers can't pull that kind of thing off." Many analysts have noted that Shi'ite Iran and the Sunni Taliban had been firm enemies since 1998, when the Taliban regime controlled most of Afghanistan and executed nine Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e Sharif. But Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid, an expert on Islamic militancy in the region and author of the book "Taliban," says that times appear to have changed. Now, with U.S. forces deployed some 60 kilometers from the Iranian border at Shindad Airfield in Herat Province, Rashid says Tehran and the Taliban have a common enemy.
Oswald
Quoted By:
"I have no doubt that Iran has been involved in channeling money and arms to various elements in Afghanistan, including the Taliban, for the last few years. They have long-running relations with many of the commanders and small-time warlords in western Afghanistan," Rashid says. "I think Iran is playing all sides in the Afghan conflict. And there are Pashtuns and non-Pashtuns who are being funded by Iran who are active in western Afghanistan. If the Iranians are convinced that the Americans are undermining them through western Afghanistan, then it is very likely that these agents of theirs have been activated." Political Backlash Still, Vatanka says it would be "almost irrational behavior" for Tehran to supply the Taliban with weapons. He says such a move would almost certainly lead to a negative domestic political backlash for Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad's government. For that reason, Vatanka says he is eagerly awaiting the assessment of Afghan and U.S. investigators about whether the arms in the Ghurian cache were stashed away by the Taliban or by one of several rival militia factions in Herat Province.
Oswald
Quoted By:
"The question is, what would get even a faction within Iran to make that type of a decision? Maybe you have excellent business ties between the Iranians and the Afghans on the other side -- not necesarily the central government in Kabul -- but local leaders in Herat who turn around saying, 'You Iranians are building roads and infrastructure here. You are setting up shops and factories. But for us to be able to guarantee that we can protect your business interests, we'll need to receive some arms.' That's an argument that one could put out: that the Iranians are essentially supplying not the Taliban, but Afghan partners to secure Iranian businesses and interests in western Afghanistan," Vatanka says. To date, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has refused to publicly support allegations of a direct link between Tehran and weapons shipments to the Taliban. "We don't have any such evidence so far of the involvement of the Iranian government in supplying the Taliban. We have a very good relationship with the Iranian government. Iran and Afghanistan have never been as friendly as they are today," Karzai has said.
Oswald
Quoted By:
Vatanka says that as long as Karzai maintains that position, skeptics around the world will dismiss suggestions from Washington that Tehran is supplying Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. "From a U.S. point of view, if the insurgency in Afghanistan is essentially escalating based on Iranian assistance, then what Washington really needs to do is to provide far more evidence that points to that -- and get Mr. Hamid Karzai in Kabul and the regional governments in Afghanistan to back the U.S. up when it makes these claims against Iran," Vatanka says. After the U.S. military failed to find the weapons of mass destruction allegedly being stockpiled in Iraq, Vatanka says, "the skeptics out there are saying, 'These [new allegations] are being made up by the U.S. to justify another war with Iran' -- which might not actually be the case. Iran might be involved. But because of the lack of evidence, the Iranians are saying, 'Who else is backing up the U.S. allegations?'"
Anonymous
>>8932120 > This is a fascinating in-depth series of articles. Is this from FOX news? this is not an anti-Democrat opinion-based rant full of distorted half-truth, so it is obviously not from FOX
Anonymous
>>8932181 Thanks. I was starting to worry I hadn't trolled anyone with my post.
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
Quoted By:
fascinating story bro
Anonymous
Showing op his efforts are appreciated bump, bump.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932187 least I could do
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932224 Agreed. Thanks OP! Bump
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
coming back after playing CoH, bump for more?
Oswald
Quoted By:
>>8932512 OP here. Thought you might enjoy. I might be dumping another later on the latest Mexican border shit.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8931980 That one is an Antique and not considered a firearm by the ATF, you could bring that home with no paperwork.
Anonymous
this thread has received 1 of 4 requests needed to trigger archival.
Anonymous
>>8931980 My guess is that the Martini-Henry was abandoned for reasons other than lack of ammo. Martini-Henrys are still made in Darra, Pakistan (just outside of Peshawar) and ammunition is still made for them there, as well. Since Darra is a Pashtun area, I'm sure that weapons and ammo easily flow into Afghanistan from there.
Darra ammo is known for its poor quality, though. Smokeless powder is generally made from shredded nitrocellulose film there.
Anonymous
>>8932635 The ones that are newly made are more than likely made in .303 British or perhaps 7.62 NATO.
That would in fact make the Martini a Martini-Enfield, or, if it's a .308, a Martini-NATO.
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
>>8932633 post a link, I'll help
Anonymous
>>8932680 wait what is this weapon?
Anonymous
>>8932722 i was just having a conversation last night about different types of bolt action rifles that had longer mag capacity
would like to know what that is
Anonymous
>>8932731 >>8932722 It looks like a commercial action on an AK receiver with gas block/rear sight, and that safety looks like it's from an No1 Mk3.
Anonymous
>>8932783 yeah it looked to me like a mash up of various components, just was curious if i was missing something.
Anonymous
>>8932783 It is, as the filename indicates, a a bolt action AK-pattern rifle. Google 'khyber pass guns' or variations thereof, and you'll find plenty of info.
Long story short though, there's a village in the border region that pretty much makes nothing but guns in the most ramshackle sweatshops imaginable.
And no, I don't know if they blocked the gas-piston tube on that AK.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932803 This guy again. The whole 'filename' bit wasn't to be a prick, but I had intended to say something about it being made in the Khyber Pass.
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
Anonymous
>>8932819 Bingo!
Isn't that, errr, at least near the Khyber Pass?
I know the story behind the Khyber Pass AKs. I just ass-umed that Daraa was in that neighborhood.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932661 >>8932831 Darra is near the Pass. The Martini-Henrys made there are chambered for the original blackpowder cartridge. They're probably used as hunting weapons, as any Pashtun hick knows how to make blackpowder and reload brass.
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
Quoted By:
>>8932831 yep, Daraa is in the Khyber (it's a bloody big place, the Khyber).
By the way, earlier on in the thread there was some discussion of Martini-Henries. Well lookee here!
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
this pic reminds me of that bit in one of the Sherlock Holmes stories where Watson is like, "it was a particularly unpleasant autumn, and the cold was troubling my leg, which still has an Afghan Jezzial bullet in it..."
Anonymous
>>8932867 No words can aptly describe how unsafe that looks, so I'll go with 'very'.
Vague Englishman !!WCSrCc9K5s7
Quoted By:
>>8932893 "iz nice gun, go boom and somebody die, maybe russian soldier, maybe faisel next to you. It so loud it vill bamboozle you!" - uncle khan's last words.
Anonymous
Thanks OP, that was interesting. Also archive.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932922 2 requests so far, mine included.
Anonymous
from same journalists tumblr thing....
How does fucking gaddafi F2000 ?
http://cjchivers.com/post/5401976501/arms-libya-where-east-meets-west Anonymous
Quoted By:
For the first time in months: A genuinely interesting thread on /k/. My utmost gratitude, OP.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
The best part of At War was their thing on Taliban marksmanship. They went to a brigade in Afghanistan:>Oh, we've been in about 150 firefights. >How many of your men have been hit? >Nobody has been touched by a Taliban bullet in this brigade. Oh Taliban you so crazy.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
talibans probably like marines in pacific in 1942 ... hurp durp fighting with same shit my grandfather used.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932092 I just bought this a couple of weeks ago. It is fantastic.
Anonymous
>>8932867 That's actually a PTRS-41 with the gas block and gas system removed.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8932680 Protip: It's a 1917 Eddystone "Enfield" (it's just another Mauser action basically) stuffed into an AK receiver. The magazine is probably from an old MG;
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8933149 no, it's not. it's not a PTRS or a PTRD, it's something else.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8933149 PTRS41 was a tilting bolt automatic, just taking the gas system out wouldn't make it into a rotating bolt single shot.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
This needs archiving, so please, go to
chanarchive.org and vote for it.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>8933149 Troll on your shining star