>>671536The speculation comes from part number two : "The heat gradually affecting the rest of the structure".
How hot? Hot enough to melt steel? Does petrol burn that hot? Yes it does. Now, if petrol spread to the nearby buildings (there's a lot of petrol in these planes, they're like "flying bombs" as I heard once) that would be enough for nearby buildings to emulate the same effect.
We should also be open to terrorists also planting bombs in these buildings beforehand.
But the questionable part is, who were the terrorists? I mean, they caught that sheik muhammed dude, has he talked? Is that talk public now?
I don't know. All I do know is that businesses capitalised off of the event, something that should have been illegal, but isn't. Something that congress should pass a law against, but didn't because it was republican controlled in the first place. And republicans were just waiting, but they weren't the operators of this event.
See, a more thorough analysis shows that it was all just "the wrong thing at the wrong time" that let us all arrive to the situation we are now. Plus, isn't that how shit always happens?