[43 / 5 / ?]
Why? Because he suggested that her campaign is "pimping" Chelsea.
Instead of going "LOL NO" or accepting his quick apology, Hillary decided to do the usual baaaawwwing thing and assume that he meant the literal meaning of "pimping" and replied that "...no temporary suspension or half-hearted apology is sufficient." So if she doesn't want him to be suspended or to apologize, what does she want MSNBC to do?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8412.html
ISN'T IT GREAT GUISE WHEN THE DEMOCRATS SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH?!
To be fair, Bill Clinton was like "whatever" when Limbaugh apologized for calling Chelsea a dog and when McCain apologized for calling her the byproduct of Janet Reno and Hillary. But that's Bill. Hillaryfags need to know the differences between the two.
Instead of going "LOL NO" or accepting his quick apology, Hillary decided to do the usual baaaawwwing thing and assume that he meant the literal meaning of "pimping" and replied that "...no temporary suspension or half-hearted apology is sufficient." So if she doesn't want him to be suspended or to apologize, what does she want MSNBC to do?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8412.html
ISN'T IT GREAT GUISE WHEN THE DEMOCRATS SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH?!
To be fair, Bill Clinton was like "whatever" when Limbaugh apologized for calling Chelsea a dog and when McCain apologized for calling her the byproduct of Janet Reno and Hillary. But that's Bill. Hillaryfags need to know the differences between the two.
