you have 10 seconds to post a good reason why your car DOESN'T have 8 cylinders
Anonymous
Quoted By:
gas millage /thread
vtak yo !EGW8pzdbCs
Quoted By:
because its got a veeeee six
Uleh !wgHOLDENMI
Quoted By:
it was determined to not need 8 cylinders at time of design
Anonymous
because i only need 4 to beat your 8 signed, planimal
Anonymous
Anonymous
Yet Another Finnfag !78SbULiULI
Quoted By:
Because it has 12.
Anonymous
Because more cylinders does not equal more power.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because glorious loltarbo instead
Anonymous
Quoted By:
because it has 6 and im ok with that id be ok with 8 if i got the same gas millage
Anonymous
>>4633393 god, i can't wait for you to get rear ended by a semi, or something. please die already
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because having less cylinders allows for a greater displacement in a smaller area.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
because BMW S50
Anonymous
Quoted By:
mine does. 99 grand cherokee limited 4.7L V8
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because it's a 1995 honda civic. Saving up for an '89 trans am, though.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633420 Butthurt, slow car owning, wankstain detected.
Go cry to mommy.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633420 nigga u hatin
i thought we were bros
;_;
signed,
planimal
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because Twingo.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Disregard that, I suck cocks. signed, planimal
CanadianChuckNorris !5igedPut0k
Quoted By:
because for 6g, I cant find something as practical while still being quick and fuel efficient with 8.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because 8 is too few.
denkoyoyo !!98lV86QAg0y
Quoted By:
just because inline 6 is the most balanced type of engine to start of
>if it doesn't have a VEEATE its not a real car hurrrrr OP is a single minded faggot.
CanadianChuckNorris !5igedPut0k
Quoted By:
>>4633481 >OP is also right... dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
Quoted By:
too large for a decent FWD setup the volvo is optimized for speed, comfort and handling, that's why it uses a lighter and more compact inline 5
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633481 Way too easily trolled man, you're a disappointment.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4633481 >carless mad poorfag hey well at least if you take a taxi youll be riding in a car with a vee ate
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633385 because it's gay, not running on all 8.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because twin turbo motherfocker
Anonymous
Fuel economy.. and VEEEEETECCC~!
Anonymous
Clinical !x3eHQvAxM6
>>4633520 I'll keep my v8 and my 30mpg
Anonymous
Quoted By:
ford thought it was a bad idea to put one in a rwd minivan. i disagree...
CanadianChuckNorris !5igedPut0k
Quoted By:
>>4633525 your 3.0? sedan or coupe
Anonymous
It does. On each side motherfucker.
Quoted By:
Because GM decided it wasn't necessary for a light-duty pickup.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
cause i drive a shitbox and i plan on getting superior gas mileage until i get the money for a sporty car
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because Ford 200. Straight-six drivers have longer cranks.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4633628 dat exhaust manifold
Anonymous
because my twin turbo'd v6 makes more horsepower than your v8 shitbox
Shifty Powers !LT1Saw/iIk
??? !rb25DEtF/o
>>4633726 >lag >twin turbo facepalm.jpg
Audifag !hkmIncFW3w!!dBx6926nJj0
Quoted By:
I don't know what you're talking about man.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Anonymous
>>4633730 Often they aren't set up sequentially, and thus do have plenty of lag.
Anonymous
>>4633748 542 bhp was a lot in '92
This is a Twin Turbo V6 btw
??? !rb25DEtF/o
Quoted By:
>>4633749 Parallel small twin turbos (like that in a VG or RB) have very minimal lag due to the size.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4633762 mfw you expect me to believe you actually drive a jaguar XJ220
mfw you need forced induction to make the same power as a v8
Shifty Powers !LT1Saw/iIk
Quoted By:
>>4633730 >implying twin turbos cant lag Anonymous
Quoted By:
Should've had a V8!
66Chrysler !!7EIjAgaAXyh
Quoted By:
>>4633385 But...my car DOES have 8 cylinders.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because my car cost $400.
rotaryfag !!5FX8uX0tFQ9
>>4633749 sequential turbos are not the only way to minimize lag, and in fact some cars frequently produce boost far before the engine is able to make use of it, and thus taper off higher in the rev range.
rotaryfag !!5FX8uX0tFQ9
Anonymous
>>4633775 You're really stupid if you still aren't getting it. All I'm saying is that the number of cylinders doesn't have a lot to do with the amount of power. And plus, most V8s in 1992 wouldn't have that much power even with twin turbos.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4633802 you're really stupid if you think a twin turbo v6 is better than a vee ate
dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4633807 well he *does* post as anon
Anonymous
>>4633807 ecoboost f150, your argument is invalid
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4633811 you don't have an argument, your argument is nonexistant
?????????? !O/sPacEbOY
Quoted By:
because it already has a 60-40 weight distribution and my motorcycle eats V-8s for breakfast...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633807 If it has more power then it is better. And plus if you think that more cylinders is the only way to more power then why stop at 8?
Aircooled Boxer ftw! !./cYD1ugJ.
Quoted By:
I can't even begin to imagine the hell it would be to cool an aircooled flat-8, also, would have to give up glorious RR design and go for MR
five hundred E's !dIckBuTTWw
Quoted By:
>>4633385 beacuse...wait i own a v8 fuck year
Anonymous
>>4633807 you're not getting it. no matter how hard you try, your v8 shitbox will never get as good gas mileage as my 300zx, and it makes the same or better horsepower as your car.
fuck off if you don't understand this.
also, the guy that was talking about jaguar engines is not me, i was the original 'twin turbo' guy.
pic related, my old car. sold it and bought a 300zx and spent the rest on coilovers and racing seats
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633414 ......yes it does. Same quality N/A V8 vs anything smaller(of same quality and N/A) will have more power....your statement is invalid.
Erebus !!LlCFGgxUCV/
Gas mileage. And I like an engine that doesnt feel like it's in a constant state of dying.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4633900 >spent the rest on coilovers and racing seats hahaha, another idiot that thinks he needs coilovers on his car that only has 6 cylinders
Anonymous
>>4633908 doesn't know jack shit about cars "Five point Bro" S197GT !BROSTANGp.
dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4633911 "but it'll get around bends faster"
still getting smoked by everything at the lights
Anonymous
Quoted By:
i dont drive a v8 because i am not a idiot
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>buy a car with a v8 >race from light to light >do sweet burnouts >not in highschool >forever alone
Anonymous
>>4633933 >drag racing >twin turbos i don't think you understand cars
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4633933 >mfw people buy adjustable coilovers and think their car automatically handles like a god !WyVrTROLLI
Quoted By:
I don't HAVE a car
Erebus !!LlCFGgxUCV/
>>4633923 Every V8 I've driven has felt tired to the point it was like it was dying. And before you ask, I've driven a brand new C5 ZO6 (had less than 20 miles on it), a 6.0 GTO, and a few different WS6s with various amounts of mods.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4633953 you were probably stepping on the wrong pedal
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633953 >Either lying like a sonofabitch to attempt an argument. >Doesn't understand what a powerful cam is. >Never driven anything with more than 4 cylinders. dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4633947 yes I do
pigfat piece of japanese shit gets burnt by everything
Anonymous
>>4633977 that's my point, if you even try to drag race or any sort of straight line race with a twin turbo'd car below 8 cylinders, you're an idiot
turbos are only good for the mileage you save in comparison to a v8
ChevelleGuy !!5AvUymIvZl6
you all have 10 seconds to post a good reason why your car DOESN'T have a big block vee 8
Anonymous
>>4633980 zr1 < gtr
in before warranty void, the zr1 would void first.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634001 zz502 in my sierra. :)
dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4634007 nice cylinder liners
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4634007 >warranty void >transmission broken >car is ugly zr1 > gtr
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634001 i haz a small block...
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4634041 >GT-R needs engine rebuild every 60k miles HAHAHAHA oh wow this can't be real
Anonymous
>>4634041 2007 called, it wants it's unsubstantiated myths back
>>4634043 zr1 on track, waranty void
gtr on track, expensive oil change- warranty intact.
zr1 < gtr
u mad?
howiJeep !MATgTD0M6U
Anonymous
Quoted By:
1. Because a V8 option was never available in my car. 2. I have not put forth sufficient effort to convert my car to run on 8 cylinders.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634052 >Press button that comes with the GTR as standard >WARRANTY VOID ZR1>Nissan
At least in the ZR1 you don't feel like you're playing a Playstation.
dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4634052 I'll take the magazines word over yours
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I have 12 liters displacement with my Volvo DH12 diesel on 6 cylinders making 420HP 2000 Nm torque at 1100 rpm. I don't see the need for 8 cylinder toys
Anonymous
>>4634066 You won't find it anywhere else. You're a cancerous faggot troll.
It's cool if you like being wrong, I know I'm right. Also GTR still > zr1 forever
Datsun's Creek !!4pJOBrDw5YJ
Quoted By:
I plan on doing an LS1 swap in the future, for my z. LS1 IS BEST V8
Firechicken !wa1Oaw/SLc
Quoted By:
>>4634041 >>4634041 >>4634041 The GT-R is such a shitty car. I don't see why anyone would buy one.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
who fucking cares if the ZR1's warranty expires, it'll still be cheaper than spraying alien jizz on your cylinder bores every 60,000 miles along with your full engine rebuild
Anonymous
>>4634097 not in nissan literature
>everything on zr1 is a wear item, replace if anything happens to it in GM literature
deal with it v8 fags, the zr1 is a trailer queen
dead !!1w3SeuwCso0
>>4634081 >gets told >gets mad this time it actually happened
don't mind me, just trusting an article written by an established journalist, instead of listening to some mad no-name over the internet
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4634110 lol you think the ZR1 is a trailer queen? for fucks sake some GT-R owner's warranty was voided because he didn't hand dry his brake discs with a towel after he washed it.
Firechicken !wa1Oaw/SLc
Quoted By:
>>4634119 Oh Nissan, so classy.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634116 and you'll be wrong, and mad to keep replying
>>4634119 >confusing zr1 with gtr nice
>Looking at the side of the car, you will notice the roof and roof halo bar are carbon fiber. These parts have a special clear coat to protect against UV fading and degradation. Customers should be advised that deep scratches cannot be repaired with regular clear coat. If a deep scratch occurs, the panel must be replaced. >If the edges of the rotor are chipped, the rotor must be replaced. >NEVER ALLOW WHEEL CLEANER, TIRE CLEANER, or BRAKE CLEANER TO CONTACT THE ROTORS. >Any product that is applied to the rotor surface will cause damage to the surface and is not covered under the GM warranty. >The ZR1 will perform well in a track environment; however, it was not designed, built or sold as a "track car." If an owner elects to use the car in such a manner, it is outside the intent of the warranty as supplied by General Motors and any damage as a result may not be covered by the GM warranty. tl;dr - whole car is a wear item
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634119 Not to mention that guy who bumped a post at <5mph, and had an £11k repair bill because some ridiculously complicated pedestrian ramping device on the hood deployed, and it cannot be reused.
http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/127250-accident-dont-do-what-i-did.html lolnissan
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4634694 because toyota the largest budget of any F1 competitor, which was like twice as big as ferrari's
>>4634691 oh hey, whose got the mullet machine
Quoted By:
>>4634723 I love my mullet machine thank you very much.
Inconcinnity !!gFp7PN0n9Cs
>>4634723 formula 1 budgets
$443,800,000 Ferrari
$353,300,000 Williams
$304,600,000 McLaren
$290,400,000 Toyota
$225,100,000 BAR
$206,800,000 Renault
$119,500,000 Sauber
$ 79,200,000 Jordan
$ 78,800,000 Jaguar
$ 39,600,000 Minardi
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4634741 it was rumored that toyota was spending nearly $700 million on F1
whether or not that's true, $400 million is a ridiculous amount to spend on an engine and i really doubt that that's true
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Anonymous
Quoted By:
ITT: 5th graders
CRXguy !!4Yc4mzCtSZ9
Quoted By:
It....does. and another one is about to have a V8, because I would get better fucking gas mileage with a chevy 350.
Ford apprentice !5zb/EKX0ks
Quoted By:
because my 8 cylinders are on my engine stand waiting for me to finish rebuilding it.
?????????????????? !GTRkY/VtrY
I have a car with 8 cylinders My 6 cylinder car will rape it on anything.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4634827 that's because it was assembled by a japanese person with their eyes half closed
?????????????????? !GTRkY/VtrY
>>4634833 Wow. You got mad even faster than I expected
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
>>4634837 wow type-r, no need to get so huttburt all of a sudden. i hardly even said anything.
Anonymous
But....I already have 8 cylinders. Now what?
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Anonymous
>>4634169 >6 cylinders + 2 turbos > 8 cylinders + 0 turbos also, errebody getting mad at this picture
but 8 cylinders + 2 turbos > 6 cylinders + 2 turbos
nyan !91iMi6CIYI
Quoted By:
No V8 sporty commuters :(>i love me my sporty commuters
?????????????????? !GTRkY/VtrY
Quoted By:
>>4634845 I see you haven't finished your helping of told from last time. Don't let me interrupt your meal
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634862 Eh, I'm more leaning towards an intercooled Vortech V1. Much easier on the wallet.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
its a fucking neon. It was fastest grocery getter stock for 5 years.
henry_ford !T/cybz7iao
Quoted By:
>>4634870 but he forgot 8 cylinders + 1 supercharger
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4634849 YOU NEED 8 MORE!!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because mine has 16
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4634951 If it's manual, they're 6spd and can get nearly 30mpg.
Anonymous
>>4634970 What does a manual have to with anything?
It doesn't help mpg that much. MAYBE 1-2mpg difference, tops, between automatic and manual.
Anonymous
>>4635004 >dat 6th gear overdrive Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4635004 >signed, dead fueleconomy.gov look yourself, stop being willfully stupid
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4635004 See
>>4635018 6th puts you in a much lower RPM thus getting better mpg.
But it still doesn't make up for the fact that they all have a weak 7.5" rear.
Anonymous
>>4634331 what? STFU, the z34 (N/A V6) made more than the previous V8 ford GTs
PSI lol talking shit like you know about turbo system
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633385 8 cylinder engine wont fit in my mini cooper s
pic related, not mine tho
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4635161 >SAVED from page 1 by replying to a post made 2 hours ago nice obvious bump
Calgar !!0BR+ceOpFbl
Quoted By:
well my GTO has an LS2 and my Truck has a 5.4L V8 so fuck you
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I dont have 2-3k
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>i drive a minivan trollface
Anonymous
>>4635161 not hard to do...
up until '98 a gt mustang only put out 215 HP...
want to make a comparison? lets take a camaro of the same year because they have been in direct competition with each other since the dawn of fucking time
the 3.8 out of the V6 camaro produces 205 HP, where as the V8 in a the same car will produce 320 HP stock.
how about another one? a 2007 ford tuarus will crank out 240...
Quoted By:
But it does...
?SaabLobster !TurbOZa05k
Quoted By:
Because it has 5
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4635161 OF same quality dumbshit. "Z34 package".....need I say more. Anyone can build a badass v6 with the right parts and cfm to out do a half ass V8. You don't listen very well....goddamn v6 owner.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
its not pigfat
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because I'm too poor to do a swap, also gas dollars.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4635479 Thank you, OBVIOUSLY that faggot doesn't understand what quality means...
Anonymous
Quoted By:
50mpg, no hybrid. U Jelly murka fag?
Seagull !fUcCUNTYtU
Quoted By:
It does.. awkward.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4636592 Cheer up bro, it's only for a couple of years.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
because: Turbo
Anonymous
e46 m3 s54 ITBs all day er day v8 fags be jelly of this responsiveness
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633385 AMERICA
FUCK YEAR !
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Both my DDs are v8. Jap v8. feels good man
chickin !PCgT67R33I
Quoted By:
Because a V8 SUV is a stupid idea, and the skidline produces more power in 4 cylinders than an LS1 does with all 8 of its.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because turbo.
Anonymous
They jelly of that 8krpm too
Anonymous
Quoted By:
cant fit 3 more cylinders, thats why bitch.
Anonymous
Anonymous
>>4633385 because V8 engines sound loud and dumb
nyan !91iMi6CIYI
Quoted By:
>>4636929 Even the AMG lineup?
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
Quoted By:
Because the gov'ment gave me $4500 for a car that wasn't worth $1000.
rotorwankel
Quoted By:
because ive got a pair of doritos on a stick. wankel
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4636929 that sounds like a perfect fit for you
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
Peasant class V8, reporting in, all of the mighty 194rwhp/269rwtq of it. ^_^ mfw when my peasant tier, bone stock 20-year old V8 makes more more horsepower than 99% of the "performance tier" N/A 4-cylinders (and double the torque) while still getting >25mpg on the highway.
Anonymous
>>4636977 my 22 year old, internally stock v8 makes more.
Alot more.
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4636977 You have a Caprice right ?
nyan !91iMi6CIYI
REPO STAN !jU441s.usg
>>4636997 That'll be a CV with those numbers, GM B-bodies didn't get LT1s until '94
Capricefag here
Anonymous
Quoted By:
because it only has four.
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637004 I don't think 4.6ls put that much down to the wheels, he quoted whp and tq.
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
Quoted By:
>>4636993 >internally stock What's your definition of the above? I've had people use that to just mean a stock shortblock.
And yeah, wasn't throwing my power numbers out there as if they were something impressive, but not bad for a motor with ~150k on it that's never been in to, is beat on pretty hard regularly, and that supposedly had 225/300 at the crank when it was fresh off the line.
Unlike other br/o/s, I understand that plenty of people out there have bigger dicks than me, lol.
Anonymous
german engineering, u mad bruh?
REPO STAN !jU441s.usg
>>4637012 '93 and earlier GM 5.7s made 180 at crank. At least the Ford 4.6 is close-ish to those numbers.
CRXguy !!4Yc4mzCtSZ9
Quoted By:
>>4637014 No, because your redline starts at 4k. My 1987 Chevy 350 doesn't even redline until 5k, brah. You been fucked!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633385 It has, but it's a W8, hence unreliable as fuck.
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
>>4637018 NPI 2v 4.6 was rated at 230 at the crank when it first came out. Not sure what they actually dyno at, though I know it's not at all impressive.
Anonymous
>>4637014 BMW... Paddle-shifters... redline at 4k...
SHITSTORM IMMINENT
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637030 The SOHC 4.6L was rated at 190hp when it came out in the early 90's.
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
WV Malibu !FnI.BKFaes
Quoted By:
I have a wonderful V8 Built in America By A Down home country boy American Nothing says America like a screaming 383 stroker with the pedal mashed to the floor pic related
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
>>4637058 In which car? All my numbers are based on what was in the Mustang at the time. It wouldn't surprise me if it was just rated higher there than in any of the other applications, especially since it replaced the at-then 215hp-rated 5.0. Mustang fanbois were shitting their pants already at Ford going away from the Windsor motors, for the replacement to make less power would've had them doing fat-man cartwheels in the streets in revolt.
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
Quoted By:
>>4637065 I did, but as soon as I saw "CV" and "4.6", my mind say "caprice must've been wrong, they have to be talking about a Crown Victoria".
Anonymous
>>4637058 Only in the 1991–1993 Lincoln Town Car, 190 hp (142 kW) and 270 lb·ft (366 N·m)
-1992–1997 Ford Crown Victoria/Mercury Grand Marquis, 210 hp (157 kW) and 270 lb·ft (366 N·m)
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
Quoted By:
>>4637072 I'm talking about when it came out in '91 in the Town Car, then the other panther sedans. My '95 Town Car was rated at 210hp and like 270tq.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4637037 That doesn't mean 4k redline fool. The band changes color as the engine warms up, letting you know how far you can push the engine, until it is fully warmed up.
Lrn2bmw. The e46 m3 has a redline of 8k
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637080 Wrong, 210hp was only for the dual exhaust option models on the CV and GM.
Anonymous
>>4637018 BULLLLLLLL SHIT
a '93 350 puts out just under 300
also how can you generalize an engine that has been in production for over 40 years
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637101 He's talking about TBI motors, not the LT1 dumbass.
Anonymous
>>4637091 So?
In a car 4000+ pounds torque is more important than 20hp anyway. it's not as if you'd rev a Town Car high enough to reach that peak.
You could lose 20hp with a dirty air filter or a bad coil-pack.
Anonymous
Because Group A rules made large displacements non competative by limiting tire size and width also you could have a max of 1.7l turbo charged motor when my car went through homologation and non turbo cars were non competative in rally
Reverend !!u0V4bkDcBzt
Quoted By:
>>4637101 In which application? The 350 is the Corvette obviously would be rated different than the 350 in a half-ton pickup.
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637105 >Only in the 1991–1993 Lincoln Town Car >Wrong >So ? Lol, why put information out there if you don't know/care if it's true. Stay in school kid.
REPO STAN !jU441s.usg
Quoted By:
>>4637101 lolrage
First, see
>>4637104 and also various earlier posts where context indicates we're talking about ~20yo cars
This post is intriguing
>>4637107
>>4637112 >Only in the 1991–1993 Lincoln Town Car Yep, same wiki page your lookin' at dipshit.
>Wrong No, wasn't wrong. You have no reading comprehension skills.
>So ? I never mentioned the dual exhaust, because that detail does not change the point. Are you not taking your Aspergers meds?
>Lol, why put information out there if you don't know/care if it's true. Why not? It got your ADHD riled-up.
>Stay in school kid. I can almost guarantee that I'm the oldest prick on /o/
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
>>4637126 I'm not looking at wiki actually.
But yes you are wrong, the 190hp version was the single exhaust equipped Town Car, Crown Vic and Grand Marquis. Again that's you being wrong, and then trying to somehow explain wiki being wrong, as you being right.
>>4637134 >Again that's you being wrong, and then trying to somehow explain wiki being wrong, as you being right. I don't know how you've come to that conclusion from my posts. I honestly don't. When did I say wiki was wrong? Oh, that's right! I didn't say that at any point. You're just an obsessive-compulsive douchebag looking for someone/something to be mad at.
Have a nice day.
Anonymous
American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
Quoted By:
>>4637149 Here, I'll explain it. First we'll start with where you reply to me trying to tell me only the Town Car came equipped with a 190hp version of the 4.6L.
>>4637058 >The SOHC 4.6L was rated at 190hp when it came out in the early 90's. >>4637080 >Only in the 1991–1993 Lincoln Town Car, 190 hp (142 kW) and 270 lb·ft (366 N·m) Then we'll move on to me trying to explain to you that only dual exhaust equipped models had 210hp. Your respond like you don't care you were wrong.
>>4637091 >So? >In a car 4000+ pounds torque is more important than 20hp anyway. it's not as if you'd rev a Town Car high enough to reach that peak. American Focus Owner !!Kyo8bWKHhkp
Quoted By:
>>4637149 >>4637149 Here, I'll explain it. First we'll start with where you reply to me trying to tell me only the Town Car came equipped with a 190hp version of the 4.6L.
>>4637058 >The SOHC 4.6L was rated at 190hp when it came out in the early 90's. >>4637080 >Only in the 1991–1993 Lincoln Town Car, 190 hp (142 kW) and 270 lb·ft (366 N·m) >>4637091 >Wrong, 210hp was only for the dual exhaust option models on the CV and GM Then we'll move on to me trying to explain to you that only dual exhaust equipped models had 210hp. Your respond like you don't care you were wrong.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>4633385 because its the best car I could find for $1k
and because it better gas mileage than my v8 bronco and is also better in every way
Tryptophan !100NXxOGzA
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because I'm not a fucking spoiled little piece of shit with daddy to pay for my 150$ a week worth of Gas. That being said, in less than a year, I'll be able to afford it, but I still won't because I don't give a fuck about performance. u mad?
Overboard and Self-Assured !!yvm0QrHZZJQ
Overboard and Self-Assured !!yvm0QrHZZJQ Tue 03 May 2011 04:29:00 No. 4637750 Report Quoted By:
it does the stealth was my first car and never fucking worked anyways so it doesnt really matter how many cylinders it has, its not going anywhere either way.