>>1253716I was really excited about the first. I have a lot of not terrible pictures such as this, but i never get around to doing flickr or anything like that.
>>1254135the second image was shot with the EF 50mm f/1.4. This was the only shot that was both in focus and not ruined by lens flare from the signal light. it's a bit abstract for my taste, and the highlights are badly blown. f/1.4 and be there...?
>>1254170I'm not a techie, so I don't know if what I said is technically true, but I was getting at the fact that looking at a gigantic 300dpi print is much different than looking at web sized images on your monitor.
>>1254236can you go into detail on what this is?