/p/ - Photography » Thread #297743

[30 / 0 / ?]

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 02:46:00 No.297743 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

11Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelDSLR-A200Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.4.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.7111Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:11:20 15:45:35RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalExposure Time1/80 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Brightness0.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1000Image Height8721

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 02:49:00 No.297744 Report

Quoted By: >>297746

One RAW file and you can switch cards...
Awesome.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 02:52:00 No.297746 Report

Quoted By:

>>297744
Sadly I can't find the 8mb I was planning on posting

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 02:56:00 No.297753 Report

Quoted By:

I actually still have a 16mb CF card at home, man those were the days.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 03:42:00 No.297783 Report

Quoted By:

Does anyone still have SmartMedia cards? I've got a 64MB one, but its reader that doesn't work with XP.

Also, 0 megabyte SD cards (the plastic ones used to plug SD reader slots in notebooks) FTW.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 03:49:00 No.297785 Report

Quoted By: >>297798

inb4 bad jpeg compression is bad & high noise at only 400 iso

now...
bad jpeg compression is bad & high noise at only 400 iso

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 04:17:00 No.297798 Report

Quoted By: >>297829

>>297785
High on cactus juice again, Anon?

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA Fri 21 Nov 2008 05:02:00 No.297821 Report

Quoted By:

I was just thinking the other day that my first hard drive--80M, which seemed enormous at the time--would store fewer than 8 photos from my 40D in the mode I normally shoot it.

And the 850M drive I got later that seemed like more space than I could ever possibly use would store about 80.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 0B, 0x0

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 05:22:00 No.297828 Report

Quoted By:

This one still works fine.

11Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareNikon Transfer 1.1 WFocal Length (35mm Equiv)105 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/4.3Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern692111Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2008:11:19 23:07:05RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/13 secF-Numberf/51.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/51.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length105.00 mm1

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 05:45:00 No.297829 Report

Quoted By:

>>297798
i bet you know the fuck that drank the rest of my cactus juice... oh wait.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:02:00 No.298128 Report

Quoted By: >>298141

My first digital camera was a Nikon Coolpix 880. 3.34 megapixels. In RAW mode you could fit on picture on the included 8MB card. We got a 64MB and then a 384MB before getting the next camera (Digital Rebel).

Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s

Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:02:00 No.298129 Report

Quoted By: >>298133

I remember a sony mavica with a 1.44mb FD drive

so slooow.

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 0B, 0x0

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:17:00 No.298133 Report

Quoted By: >>298135 >>298137 >>298139 >>298144

>>298129
INTERPOLATED MEGA PIXEL IMAGES! FUCK YEAH!

11Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiFirmware VersionFirmware 1.0.5Owner NameunknownSerial Number0420104373111Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2007:08:04 10:48:49Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/2.2Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/2.2Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3888Image Height2592RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed224Camera Actuations-325648384Color Matrix1291

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:20:00 No.298135 Report

Quoted By: >>298148 >>298182

>>298133
Funny thing how that old crap has a constant f/2.0 lens while every compact nowadays is f/2.8 or even slower.

Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s

Butterfly !xlgRMYva6s Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:36:00 No.298137 Report

Quoted By: >>298142

>>298133
Unfortunatly (or not) i cannot think of mavicas without thinking of some sports photog shooting with one and constantly ejecting spent floppys and slamming new ones in like some sort of weird ak.

Awesome image however.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:41:00 No.298139 Report

Quoted By:

>>298133
I loved those things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:47:00 No.298141 Report

Quoted By:

I've still got 128s and 512s running around, but that's it.

>>298128

My first camera and digital camera was an all-auto exposure, scale focus (!) Agfa so old DP Review doesn't list it. 640x480 JPEGs and TIFFs IIRC, but that looked fine on 800x600 monitors. I pulled it out of the graveyard a few months ago, it actually fit well in the hand and had an actual brightline finder. IIRC the LCD screen was just for settings and review, no live view.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 0B, 0x0

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:48:00 No.298142 Report

Quoted By:

>>298137

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Nov 2008 23:56:00 No.298144 Report

Quoted By:

>>298133
i used to dream about having one of these cameras because shooting directly to a common media was incredibly appealing. take pictures, drop floppy into computer, pictures!

this was when I was taking pictures on film and begging my mom to get the pictures developed and buy me more film, god.

Serenar !m827jEgWi.

Serenar !m827jEgWi. Sat 22 Nov 2008 00:09:00 No.298148 Report

Quoted By: >>298206

>>298135
That's because of the tiny sensor size.

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA

ac !!VPzQAxYPAMA Sat 22 Nov 2008 01:56:00 No.298182 Report

Quoted By: >>298206

>>298135
>Funny thing how that old crap has a constant f/2.0 lens while every compact nowadays is f/2.8 or even slower.
Yeah, I was surprised when I noticed that, too. Still, only a 1/3" sensor, and 3x zoom, so it's a small enough image surface that they can get a wide aperture without a lot of work.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 0B, 0x0

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 01:59:00 No.298183 Report

Quoted By: >>298186 >>298198 >>298208

lol mavica. there was someone selling a MVC-FD91 mavica on kijiji around here a few days ago. PAID 500 SELLING FOR ONLY 325!!!

yeah maybe like 10 years ago

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 02:09:00 No.298186 Report

Quoted By: >>298187

>>298183

Please tell me you're joking or they were.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 02:14:00 No.298187 Report

Quoted By:

>>298186
people are fucking retarded when it comes to resale prices
Craigslist and kijiji exacerbate that because they have no listing fees, so the worst that happens if you overcharge is you get spam emails.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 02:44:00 No.298198 Report

Quoted By:

>>298183

FUCK YEAH, STEADYSHOT!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 03:06:00 No.298206 Report

Quoted By:

>>298182
>>298148
That 1/3" sensor isn't that much smaller than 1/2.5" ones used in typical modern compacts, and most of them still have 3-4x zoom.
(Well, there are high-end compacts with 1/1.8" or even larger sensors, but incidentally, those are usually the ones with the fastest lenses too)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 03:08:00 No.298208 Report

Quoted By:

>>298183
He should've kept it for another 10-20 years. THEN it would cost $325 again, lol.

noclue !!2yUmAID3520

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unknown.jpg, 0B, 0x0

noclue !!2yUmAID3520 Sat 22 Nov 2008 03:56:00 No.298221 Report

Quoted By:

the fact that this image was just shot with my phone featuring 4gb of memory is the cream on top.

camera shown works perfectly, only the battery compartment door won't close anymore.
(my sister dropped it from about two meters on concrete - i doubt my rebel xt would still work after that)
also a 64 mb smart media card is inserted.

11Equipment MakeSony EricssonCamera ModelT650iCamera SoftwareR7AA024 prg1200-2562_GENERIC_SN 0.0111Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2008:11:21 23:51:04RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSubject Distance RangeUnknownExposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/2.5ISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias-2 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1024Image Height7691

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 04:24:00 No.298225 Report

Quoted By:

For my family's first camera, the memory card we bought was a 128mb we paid nearly 50 bucks for.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Nov 2008 04:36:00 No.298231 Report

Quoted By:

i remember spending $75 on a 16MB sandisk CF card

it's still in my kodak DC3200

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches