>>298280I don't know much about the 35mm Fuji, not having shot one. But I've got both the GW690II and the GSW690II. The GW690 that you show is the series III which has the bubble level, and easier film changing and plastic exterior, but since I've had no problems with mine, I've never bothered getting the series III.
I use the GSW690 more than the GW690, and because of the lack of a meter, I normally stick it in my pack with a digital SLR. A Fuji GSW690II shooting black and white film will easily optically out-perform a Nikon D200, and while I haven't tested this with colour and chromes, there's no reason to expect the results to be different.
A 6x9 negative, scanned at 4800dpi will produce an image with greater than 150MP. Which isn't to say that all those pixels are useful, or wanted, but it's possible. If you get a negative scanned professionally, the results will be better.
The GSW690II can be had for between $600 and $1000 and the GW690II is between $400 and $700. That's pretty cheap for the performance you get. The cameras are also very light, and even though the shutter sounds like a toy going *clack*, you can't complain about the results.
The only problem with both the GSW and the GW is that they don't have a bulb mode, but something called a "T" mode, which opens the shutter when you depress the shutter release. You close the shutter either by advancing a frame or changing the shutter speed. For most situations, you can just put the lens cap on the camera, and then change shutter speed.
So, to summarise: I like the Fuji Rangefinder I own.