>>19AND CHAR_BIT == 8 AINT REQUIRED SO DATS Y I WUD MAKE IT SO DAT IT WERE
>>17,20IF U WANT CUTE THREDS UR BETTER OFF USING A CUTE LANGUAGE LIKE GO. DOSE HYENAS AT DA ISO WANT C TO BE A BLOATED HUNK OF UNUSEABLE SHIT, SO DAT'S Y DEY'VE BEEN FUCKIN IT UP WITH THREDS, N DAT'S Y DEANIS RICKY DID HIMSELF IN. DER'S SERIOUSLY NO NEED FOR C TO SUPPORT THREDS. U HAVE FUCKIN pthread IF U *REALLY* NEED DAT SHIT, BUT TRADITIONALLY PEOPLE WHO WERE WRITIN DAEMONS HAVE USED EITHER fork() OR select(), AND DAT'S WORKED REAL FUCKIN WELL WITH C PROGRAMS.
DA PEOPLE WHO WANT THREDS R MOSTLY DA SAME RETOIDS WHO DESIGN HUGE USERSPACE PROGRAMS DAT FUNCTION LIKE MINI OPERATING SYSTEMS. DESE RETOIDS SHUD BE POINTED AT REMEDIAL PROGRAMMING COURSES, NOT ENCOURAGED BY STUPID SHIT LIKE DA <threads.h> INTERFACE.
C LIBRARY IMPLEMENTERS JUST CANT BE FUCKED IMPLEMENTING <threads.h> COS 1) DA IDEA OF PUTTING THREDS IN C IS A FUCKIN JOKE, N 2) <threads.h> IS A FUCKIN JOKE IN GENERAL. PUTTIN THREDS IN C++ IS FITTING COS C++ IS A BLOATED HUNK OF SHIT, SO DA MORE USELESS FEATURES DEY CHUCK INTO DA C++ STANDARD DA BETTER. BUT FOR C, <threads.h> IS A FUCKING DISGRACE.
WEN U THINK ABOUT ALL DA STUPID LITTLE CHILDREN WHO R IN CHARGE OF CHANGING DA C STANDARD, IT'S NO FUCKING WONDER DAT DEANIS RICKY DID HIMSELF IN. DESE HYENAS ARE JUST TRYING TO DESTROY DA LANGUAGE DAT DEANIS RICKY LOVED IN DA SUBTLEST WAY POSSIBLE. HOW COME PEOPLE WHOSE OPINIONS ACTUALLY MATTER, LIKE US FUCKERS WHO HUNG OUT AT BELL LABS AT DA TIME, AINT ON DA COMMITTEE ANYMORE? N HOW COME WE HAVE A BUNCH OF MICROSOFT'S DRONES -- HUNGARIAN-NOTATION-WIELDING BARBARIANS -- CALLIN DA SHOTS INSTED?
IF ANYTHING, DA STANDARD'S JUST GOTTEN SHITTIER AND SHITTIER AFTER EACH MAJOR PUBLICATION.
