Anonymous
>>14734971 Why do all the male models have no cocks showing?
Ted, the Patient Hunter
Quoted By:
>>14734978 Why do most models seem to be yelling at something?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14734978 Doesn't 40k fluff say that no one has genitals?
Anonymous
Quoted By:
I'm still pissed they got rid of Maiden Guard for High Elves, and that was 4 editions ago..
Anonymous
>>14734978 Nice strawman arguement.
But several old models came with breast showing, such as the old deamonettes, and have been replaced with more... conservative models
Anonymous
>I NEED TO SEE BREASTS ON MY TINY FIGUREENS SO I CAN FAP TO THEM! WHY DOESN'T GW HELP ME FAP TO LITTLE PIECES OF PLASTIC!?!?!?!?!?
Ragnasal !!IDPwmdBD5xo
Why is there not a single Slaaneshi character that looks badass instead of derp? Also, when will Tzeentch get buffed?
Anonymous
>>14734971 >Does Games Workshop hate female models? No, but Games Workshop's primary target demographic (prepubescent boys) don't like girls in their toy-soldiers games.
>And why do all new models have no nipples showing? Not that it is a big deal, but if they are censoring just to appeal to a younger audience, it is kind of annoying. Plenty of new models have nipples showing. Just not the female ones.
Anonymous
>>14734992 Show me your honor!
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
Anonymous
>>14734994 You're right, bro. Not like that bit was a side note to the original topic or anything. Nice call, bro.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>And why do all new models have no nipples showing? Because the vocal minority bitched and whinged at GW until they pulled the old demonettes range and replaced them.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735000 >prepubescent boys more like pubescent boys, who love tits on anything.
Anonymous
>>14735010 Hey bro, stop broing up the bro place, you broey bro bro bro double bro!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14734999 >Why is there not a single Slaaneshi character that looks badass instead of derp? Sigvald the Magnificent is pretty cool.
>Also, when will Tzeentch get buffed? Never. Tzeentch is the unpopular nerdy whipping boy of the ruinous powers, only played by those who like thoughtful, intellignet villains instead of frothing lunatics. Therefore he is the least marketable and always gets the worst rules.
Anonymous
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
>>14734992 The old Daemonettes were altered to be more like the old designs, playing up the "monstrous androgynous horror" aspect of Slaanesh and away from the lurid sexuality of the previous designs. Adding bare breasts wouldn't have really added anything to the new design, so they didn't put them in. Simple as that.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
How insecure is /tg/. Like 1/4 of the people who browse this board are like op.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735033 >The old Daemonettes were altered The new Daemonettes, rather. Derp.
Anonymous
In the old days there were tons of naked figs. I remember Ral partha sold this set called Slave market, which had like a dozen naked slave girls. Wish i'd bought it while it was still around, be fun to paint.
Anonymous
I never thought I would live to the day when roleplaying neckbeards didn't care about breasts and naked breasts in their roleplaying
Anonymous
>>14735033 > Slaanesh > Lack of sexual traits Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735045 NO YOU IMATURE IDIOT!1!
ONLY EVER PAINT MODELS THAT ARE GRIMDARK AND COVERED IN SKULLS AND ARMOUR!!!!
Anonymous
>>14735051 Now, breasts in your figurines mean you're a pathetic loser, unlike those manly men that paint skull-covered figurines marketed to twelve-year-olds.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735083 You seem to think the fact that GW is now run by corporate idiots who market at kids instead of the original fanbase means anything about the people who still play it.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735056 Slaanesh is about more than sexuality. Besides, the new models do have sexual aspects to them - they're all wearing basques and loincloths, and not a lot else. It's just been played down to make room for the creepy, horrific aspects of Slaanesh. The idea that someone looking at this mono-breasted androgynous bird-crab-thing can't stop him or herself from having a SHOULD NOT WANT moment.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Can someone post up the old Maiden Guard and the Daemonettes from the older edition models? I want to look at some pretty-ish things.
Anonymous
It isnt a big deal if it was a design choice. But it is a big deal if they are dumbing down to attract a more childish audience
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Daemonettes? Pretty? Haha, oh wow.
Anonymous
GW's modelmakers are have trouble making female faces. Doing something roundish and smooth is a problem due to the scale, even the gorgeous female models from infinity can have trouble with this aswell. If you look at the pink haired girl in the pic, she looks kinda odd in another angle. And you need to make several faces that look diferent, pretty hard an tideus work, but I guess the succubus head in one of the better. Lets hope that the (HOPEFULLY) future sister of battle's in plastic are equally gorgeous! But of course, Infinity also got allot of female models that have helmets, just due to the fact it is hard to make female heads look different in this scale.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735135 People will, unfortunately, almost always assume the latter because they're looking for reasons to get pissy at GW. Even if it's far more likely to be the former, so long as it gives them a reason to start bitching on the internet, they'll assume the worst.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735003 >(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) Anonymous
Well, as far as "pretty" GW models are concerned, there's the Wood Elf spellweaver, Khalida, and the Death-Cult Assassins that come to mind. Even then, they're all sorts of angular, but they do look female.
Anonymous
>>14735003 I tought Oglaf was /tg/ related
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Properly painted, they look even better.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735188 The problem wasn't that it was Oglaf, the problem is it was a NSFW Oglaf comic.
>>14735185 Don't forget Lelith.
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
>>14735140 I'll second that the Succubus model looks pretty damn femenine (bulging biceps and all).
But at the same time, what doesn't look feminine about her I ignore. Why? She's an Eldar. I.e: not human. So it's pretty obvious she doesn't look entirely female.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14734971 >>GW models are basically culturists on drugs with impossible armors, huge shoulder pauldrons that can't possibly be useful, and retarded weapons >>No nipples >>WHERE IS MY REALISM Anonymous
>>14735003 I would like to understand this ban. Not arguing, its only that I usualy make Kronar jokes and I dont want to get banned. So, was it for the joke, or what?
Anonymous
>female models Why not a single guards woman?? Just a single model!!!
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735195 also, eldars have shitty narrow hips.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
>>14735206 He posted the comic strip in question, which was NSFW, and caught a ban for it. No harm in making the joke.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735206 The big penis and the man arse. I would guess.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Because Naomi Campbell is a bitch.
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
>>14735210 I'll also second this. The only model even close to a female guardsman I have is the Sororitas Hospitallier from the WH Inquisitor box.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
>>14735230 >>14735210 There was a limited edition Female commissar model released a while ago. Two or three of the old Penal Legion models were female as well.
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
Quoted By:
>>14735238 Yes, but they're in desperate need of an update. Female models from 3rd and 2nd Ed were incredibly ugly compared to the models put out by GW now.
Anonymous
>>14735216 Ah, thank you DLFG. Now it makes sense.
Also, I know its not the thread, but since you are here, I´m seeking pics for a redhead elf male druid...
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
>>14735264 >redhead elf male druid I'm not sure I'll be able to hit all the specifics, but I'll see what I've got in the general theme. A bit of photoshopping might turn this guys hair red.
Anonymous
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
40Kfag from /m/ !!rthE8hgFXea
>>14735278 sweet mother of the emperor put that thing away
Anonymous
>>14735274 Thank you so much, you are awesome!
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
Quoted By:
>>14735283 Even her tits look angry.
Anonymous
>>14735290 Does that make you second-hand fanboy?
Or a fanboy ofthe second generation?
Or simply a fangirl-fanboy?
I shall contemplat this.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
Uh, DLFG? You can stop now. I think he got what he wanted.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
There's one male head portrait here.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735300 Bring us your conclusions when you are finished, Wisdom Seeker.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735278 I think it's probably better that GW don't make female Imperial Guard if they feel the need to give them cleavage when they do make them.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Another male picture amidst some female ones.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735327 I hope that you're trolling by this point
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735312 Nope, I´m steel lurking here. I said DLFG is awesome for starting an image dump for us always we ask, without hesitate, at any moment, thread or request made. Also she will be more awesome to me if she provides me the almost perfect pic for the druid.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735313 Jesus christ. That guy better be careful or he'll have someone's eye out with those things.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
This is the last thing I've got, I'm afraid.
Anonymous
>>14735003 this is probably the saddest thing ive seen on /tg/. Theres a limit to your crusade you wacky admins, Oglaf is a terrible thing to ban over.
Anonymous
>>14735312 Nope, I´m still lurking here. I said DLFG is awesome for starting an image dump for us always we ask, without hesitate, at any moment, thread or request made. Also she will be more awesome to me if she provides me the almost perfect pic for the druid.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
For the daemonettes; GW went to the previous editions for the look of the plastic daemon models. Although what DLFG said earlier is also a part of it.
Take a look at the 3rd edition bloodletters (bestial and hoofed) and blue/pink horrors (eldritch abominations) in comparison to the classic (2nd edition?) metals and new plastics.
For the bloodletters the return to form is beneficial.. for the horrors and 'nettes.. less so, but it's not a change based solely on "nipples and sexuality are bad for the children"
>>14735140 The new Dark Eldar are pretty good, as far as GW faces are.
The stock photo of the succubus is worse than the model is in the flesh. The wyches are also pretty good, though the build of both is intentionally masculine (to aid in part swapping, which is a boon)
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735335 Thak you anyways, I´ll probably use something after a bit of photoshop. Thank you so much.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735337 The pic was NSFW. Righteous Banhammer here, nothing to complain here.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
>>14735339 Not so much a dump this time, unfortunately. Almost all of my male Elves are warrior-types, not terribly Druid-y.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
Games Workshop only hates all of their customers.
Anonymous
>>14735362 Well, except for the armour (This druid wears leather and skins) wild/forest/wood elves with longswords or bows would do the trick. Maybe in this description fit more pictures.
Anonymous
because I can; Original bloodletter
Anonymous
Quoted By:
2nd edition Bloodletter (center) 3rd edition Bloodletter (left and right)
Anonymous
brother-vinni.com does a lady miniature which fufills GW worst marketing nightmares quite nicely.
OP should buy it.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735387 That opens things up a little more. I'll see what I can find.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Anonymous
>>14735003 I will never, ever understand the point of SFW boards on 4chan.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Anonymous
>>14735395 Does it come with the yellow circle.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735418 no that's extra,
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735391 Fuckin hell, those look awesome. No wonder they wanted to go back to their roots on that model.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735395 Why would anyone going into battle half naked?
Well, except General Buttnaked.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735408 Neither do I. But Lawful Neutral, they dont pay me to think.
...In fact, they dont pay me.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Alright, that's a few more I could toss in. Better than nothing, I guess.
Deathleaper's Fangirl !!YD/t8+iuFvd
Quoted By:
>>14735458 >a The, rather. One of these days I'm going to start proofreading my own posts.
Anonymous
Quoted By:
>>14735458 Yep. One more time, thank you.
That Guy !CrwtTbFNxQ
Quoted By:
>>14735395 >bare-breasted female commisar ALL OF MY WHY