[245 / 127 / ?]
Quoted By: >>3535418 >>3535678 >>3535738 >>3537032 >>3537764 >>3537848 >>3539517 >>3540005 >>3541700 >>3541988
/wg/, why are you here?
You're sitting there, basking in the radiance of your computer, looking through page after page for that one perfect wallpaper - the one you can leave on your screen for months and be satisfied.
You're searching for The Perfect Wall like Ernest Rutherford searched for the nucleus, firing alpha particles at a thin sheet of gold atoms; most pass on by, unheeded; some graze the target; but none hit the mark perfectly.
And yet, you know it exists. That nucleus. That wallpaper.
Most walls in /wg/ fall under one of the following (non-mutually exclusive) categories: just plain boring, sexy pin-ups, flippant humor, abstract graphics, nostalgiafests, geekgasm, angsty/rebellious, and, of course, those text-overladen, look-at-me-and-how-deep-I-am, pseudo-intellectual 'inspirational' walls.
It is the last category with which I take great issue. No quote, no matter how witty, thoughtful or insightful, will satisfy. A quote is swindled intelligence.
The whole point of a wallpaper is to express your personal identity. You may find something funny and keep it up for a few days, but you'll get tired of it and come back here, looking for the next funny thing. You may have a hot girl up, but she quickly becomes used and ignored. Any quote is a hollow lie - it speaks to someone else's character primarily, and only to yours by proxy.
You're sitting there, basking in the radiance of your computer, looking through page after page for that one perfect wallpaper - the one you can leave on your screen for months and be satisfied.
You're searching for The Perfect Wall like Ernest Rutherford searched for the nucleus, firing alpha particles at a thin sheet of gold atoms; most pass on by, unheeded; some graze the target; but none hit the mark perfectly.
And yet, you know it exists. That nucleus. That wallpaper.
Most walls in /wg/ fall under one of the following (non-mutually exclusive) categories: just plain boring, sexy pin-ups, flippant humor, abstract graphics, nostalgiafests, geekgasm, angsty/rebellious, and, of course, those text-overladen, look-at-me-and-how-deep-I-am, pseudo-intellectual 'inspirational' walls.
It is the last category with which I take great issue. No quote, no matter how witty, thoughtful or insightful, will satisfy. A quote is swindled intelligence.
The whole point of a wallpaper is to express your personal identity. You may find something funny and keep it up for a few days, but you'll get tired of it and come back here, looking for the next funny thing. You may have a hot girl up, but she quickly becomes used and ignored. Any quote is a hollow lie - it speaks to someone else's character primarily, and only to yours by proxy.