>>20330951I'm sorry, Phil, but your film degree is worthless.
While a film can be observed, whether it is "good" is entirely subjective.
A theory may be popular, and "accepted" by many "experts", but that does not make it a fact.
Film stock can be high quality, according to various production methods, and observed and measured. But as soon as someone starts watching a film, the experience is entirely subjective.
Your example was irrelevant because you didn't give an opinion. However, if I said I think you might be crazy, then that opinion of mine is perfectly valid, even if I'm not an expert in psychiatry.