>>148965474That's not deconstructionalism, that's just a chaotic and unreliable relationship between player and narrator. For there to be a deconstruction, there first must be a structure. Deconstructionalism came from structionalism. Again, it's not a deconstructionalism.
>>148964712The picture is what you look like. Art is not entirely subjective and is judged primarily through how well and how advanced it communicates with its audience. Art is worthless if people can just draw their own meaning from a piece. I might as well dig a rock out of the river bed and present it as art if people are just going to draw its own meaning from it. For example, story telling has always existed as a means of expressing something from the story teller to his audience. This piece was bare bones simple that only a child could find elaborate. That's fine if the author's audience was children, but it wasn't.