>>7555750I could argue this to death, but people like you, would simply never come to accept it.
Look, there is actually tons of fossil evidence which show the progression of evolution. The problem with this though is the fact that fossils, believe it or not, are quiet rare. Additionally, evolution is very very slow; it doesn't happen over a period of a single birth, it takes a lot of time.
One of my favorite things to point out about evolution is something we take for granted every day - the color red. Ever notice that it stands out amongst any other color? If you were to look around your room, any thing that's red will catch your eye faster than any thing else.
Why is this? Because we evolved to have the trait of seeing that color. It was the primary source of our food before we became who we are today (before differentiating so greatly from the great apes). So, those who had the trait of being able to see red were able to feed them selves better, and as such that particular gift became dominant.
Of course, there is still the underlying fact that occasionally a hiccup will occur; proof that our genes still go back to the days when we couldn't see red. I'm of course talking about color blindness.
Finally, you can not possibly deny the existance of the Neanderthal, and the Homo Eractus. All subspecies of the Homo Genus; proof that evolution took place, and there were break offs.
