>>9377758>>9377758Little did the greenman know that the entire situation had been orchestrated by a mysterious man in a red hat. The redman had done everything within his power to make sure the greenman went done the left path.
The redman had deliberately made the left path sunny to encourage the greenman to go down it. The redman had also diverted the right side path to go up a hill, knowing that the greenman hated walking uphill. He also researched the greenman and learned that the greenman is left handed and subconsciously favors "left" things. The redman put cobwebs on the right side and daises on the left side. He put thick overgrown tree roots right on the entrance to the right side and he put clean grass on the left side.
Not only that, but the redman also broke the greenmans leg 20 years ago then made it heal in an odd shape, which is what gave the greenman a dislike of walking uphill.
As a fail-safe, the red man had blocked the right hand path off just around the first bend, to ensure the greenman would eventually go down the left side path.
The redman did all this, and countless more things that I can not be bothered to list to ensure the greenman eventually went down the left side path.
Tell me this, if the greenman had known all these things the redman had done, would the greenman have pretended he really had a choice? Probably not.
In the example the greenman didn't know, and in his mind he was making an unbiased and personal decision. He was making a choice, and the fact that his end result was predetermined is irrelevant.
Does that make sense to you?